Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Modification/Polishing Around Implant Abutments.
Park, Cheryl J; Son, Jenny Jin; Lin, Richard; Phark, Jin-Ho; Wilson, Melissa L; Chee, Winston W; Cho, George.
Afiliação
  • Park CJ; Division of Restorative Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Son JJ; Division of Restorative Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Lin R; Division of Restorative Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Phark JH; Division of Restorative Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Wilson ML; University of Southern California KECK School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
  • Chee WW; Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Cho G; Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
J Oral Implantol ; 48(3): 202-209, 2022 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33945621
Subcrestal placement of implants may have interproximal bone proximity issues that interfere with the submucosal contour of implant-supported zirconia restorations during delivery of the restorations. Modification of the mesial distal submucosal areas may be necessary to fully seat the restoration without impingement of the interproximal bone. Our aim was to determine if modification of submucosal cervical contour of implant supported zirconia-titanium base (Zi-Ti base) restorations resulted in a significant change in fracture strength compared with Zi-Ti base restorations without any modification near the cervical submucosal area. Implant Zi-Ti base restorations designed in the form of a maxillary premolar were made for the Straumann implant lab analog. Zirconia samples were cemented onto the Ti-base and the test group (N = 20) underwent recontouring and polishing at the junction of the Zi-Ti base cervical areas. The control group (N = 20) did not undergo any modifications. All 40 samples underwent fracture testing with an Instron machine. We assessed differences between modified and unmodified implants restorations using a 2-tailed t test for independent samples. Fracture strength values (N) ranged from 4354.68 to 6412.49 in the test group (N = 20) and from 5400.31 to 6953.22 in the control group (N = 20). The average fracture strength in the control group (6154.84 ± 320.50) was higher than in the modified group (5593.13 ± 486.51; P < .001). Modification of submucosal contour significantly decreased fracture strength. However, the average fracture strength exceeded the masticatory forces of humans.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Coroas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Oral Implantol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Coroas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Oral Implantol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos