Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of Salpingectomy With Delayed Oophorectomy Versus Salpingo-oophorectomy With Quality of Life in BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Steenbeek, Miranda P; Harmsen, Marline G; Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline; de Jong, Marieke Arts; Maas, Angela H E M; Prins, Judith B; Bulten, Johan; Teerenstra, Steven; van Bommel, Majke H D; van Doorn, Helena C; Mourits, Marian J E; van Beurden, Marc; Zweemer, Ronald P; Gaarenstroom, Katja N; Slangen, Brigitte F M; Brood-van Zanten, Monique M A; Vos, M Caroline; Piek, Jurgen M J; van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R C W; Apperloo, Mirjam J A; Coppus, Sjors F P J; Massuger, Leon F A G; IntHout, Joanna; Hermens, Rosella P M G; de Hullu, Joanne A.
Afiliação
  • Steenbeek MP; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Harmsen MG; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Hoogerbrugge N; Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • de Jong MA; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Maas AHEM; Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Prins JB; Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Bulten J; Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Teerenstra S; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • van Bommel MHD; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • van Doorn HC; Department of Gynecology, Erasmus MC Cancer Clinic, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Mourits MJE; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • van Beurden M; Centre for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Zweemer RP; Department of Gynecological Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Gaarenstroom KN; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Slangen BFM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Brood-van Zanten MMA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Vos MC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AmsterdamUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Piek JMJ; Gynecologic Oncologic Centre South location Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  • van Lonkhuijzen LRCW; Gynecologic Oncologic Centre South location Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Apperloo MJA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AmsterdamUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Coppus SFPJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
  • Massuger LFAG; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
  • IntHout J; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Hermens RPMG; Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • de Hullu JA; Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
JAMA Oncol ; 7(8): 1203-1212, 2021 Aug 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34081085
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE Most women with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant undergo premature menopause with potential short- and long-term morbidity due to the current method of ovarian carcinoma prevention risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Because the fallopian tubes play a key role in ovarian cancer pathogenesis, salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy may be a novel risk-reducing strategy with benefits of delaying menopause.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare menopause-related quality of life after risk-reducing salpingectomy (RRS) with delayed oophorectomy with RRSO in carriers of the BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS:

A multicenter nonrandomized controlled preference trial (TUBA study), with patient recruitment between January 16, 2015, and November 7, 2019, and follow-up at 3 and 12 months after surgery was conducted in all Dutch university hospitals and a few large general hospitals. In the Netherlands, RRSO is predominantly performed in these hospitals. Patients at the clinical genetics or gynecology department between the ages of 25 and 40 years (BRCA1) or 25 to 45 years (BRCA2) who were premenopausal, had completed childbearing, and were undergoing no current treatment for cancer were eligible.

INTERVENTIONS:

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy at currently recommended age or RRS after completed childbearing with delayed oophorectomy. After RRSO was performed, hormone replacement therapy was recommended for women without contraindications. MAIN OUTCOMES AND

MEASURES:

Menopause-related quality of life as assessed by the Greene Climacteric Scale, with a higher scale sum (range, 0-63) representing more climacteric symptoms. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, sexual functioning and distress, cancer worry, decisional regret, and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS:

A total of 577 women (mean [SD] age, 37.2 [3.5] years) were enrolled 297 (51.5%) were pathogenic BRCA1 variant carriers and 280 (48.5%) were BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. At the time of analysis, 394 patients had undergone RRS and 154 had undergone RRSO. Without hormone replacement therapy, the adjusted mean increase from the baseline score on the Greene Climacteric Scale was 6.7 (95% CI, 5.0-8.4; P < .001) points higher during 1 year after RRSO than after RRS. After RRSO with hormone replacement therapy, the difference was 3.6 points (95% CI, 2.3-4.8; P < .001) compared with RRS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that patients have better menopause-related quality of life after RRS than after RRSO, regardless of hormone replacement therapy. An international follow-up study is currently evaluating the oncologic safety of this therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02321228.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Salpingo-Ooforectomia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Salpingo-Ooforectomia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda