Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sentinel lymph node biopsy guideline concordance in melanoma: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Narang, Jatin; Hue, Jonathan J; Bingmer, Katherine; Hardacre, Jeffrey M; Winter, Jordan M; Ocuin, Lee M; Ammori, John B; Mangla, Ankit; Bordeaux, Jeremy; Rothermel, Luke D.
Afiliação
  • Narang J; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Hue JJ; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Bingmer K; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Hardacre JM; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Winter JM; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Ocuin LM; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Ammori JB; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Mangla A; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Bordeaux J; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Rothermel LD; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(4): 669-678, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34109633
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the impact of treating facility type on guideline-concordant sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) management in T1a* (defined as a Breslow depth <0.76 mm without ulceration or mitoses) and T2/T3 melanoma. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Database from 2012 to 2016. RESULTS: Our cohort included 109,432 patients. For T1a* melanomas, 85% of patients received guideline-concordant SLNB management at community and academic facilities versus 75% of patients at integrated network facilities (p < .001). Over 83% of patients with T2/T3 melanoma treated at an academic facility received guideline-concordant SLNB management versus 77% treated at a community facility (p < .001). Adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, integrated (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 0.54), and comprehensive community (aOR = 0.74) facilities were less likely to provide guideline-concordant SLNB management in patients with T1a* melanoma compared to academic facilities. Community facilities (aOR = 0.72) were less likely to provide guideline-concordant SLNB management in patients with T2/T3 melanoma compared to academic facilities. CONCLUSION: Academic facilities provide the highest rate of guideline-concordant sentinel lymph node management. Comparatively, community programs may underutilize SLNB in T2/T3 disease, while integrated and comprehensive community facilities may over-utilize SLNB in T1a* disease.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Padrões de Prática Médica / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela / Linfonodo Sentinela / Melanoma Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas / Padrões de Prática Médica / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela / Linfonodo Sentinela / Melanoma Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos