Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Economic evaluation of betibeglogene autotemcel (Beti-cel) gene addition therapy in transfusion-dependent ß-thalassemia.
Kansal, Anuraag R; Reifsnider, Odette S; Brand, Sarah B; Hawkins, Neil; Coughlan, Anna; Li, Shujun; Cragin, Lael; Paramore, Clark; Dietz, Andrew C; Caro, J Jaime.
Afiliação
  • Kansal AR; Evidera, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Reifsnider OS; Evidera, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Brand SB; Evidera, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Hawkins N; Visible Analytics, Oxford, UK.
  • Coughlan A; Evidera, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Li S; Evidera, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Cragin L; Evidera, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
  • Paramore C; Bluebird Bio, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Dietz AC; Bluebird Bio, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Caro JJ; Evidera, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
J Mark Access Health Policy ; 9(1): 1922028, 2021 Jun 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34178295
ABSTRACT

Background:

Standard of care (SoC) for transfusion-dependent ß-thalassemia (TDT) requires lifelong, regular blood transfusions as well as chelation to reduce iron accumulation.

Objective:

This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of betibeglogene autotemcel ('beti-cel'; LentiGlobin for ß-thalassemia) one-time, gene addition therapy compared to lifelong SoC for TDT. Study

design:

Microsimulation model simulated the lifetime course of TDT based on a causal sequence in which transfusion requirements determine tissue iron levels, which in turn determine risk of iron overload complications that increase mortality. Clinical trial data informed beti-cel clinical parameters; effects of SoC on iron levels came from real-world studies; iron overload complication rates and mortality were based on published literature.

Setting:

USA; commercial payer perspective

Participants:

TDT patients age 2-50

Interventions:

Beti-cel is compared to SoC. Main outcome

measure:

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) utilizing quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)

Results:

The model predicts beti-cel adds 3.8 discounted life years (LYs) or 6.9 QALYs versus SoC. Discounted lifetime costs were $2.28 M for beti-cel ($572,107 if excluding beti-cel cost) and $2.04 M for SoC, with a resulting ICER of $34,833 per QALY gained.

Conclusion:

Beti-cel is cost-effective for TDT patients compared to SoC. This is due to longer survival and cost offset of lifelong SoC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: J Mark Access Health Policy Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: J Mark Access Health Policy Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...