Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Surov, Alexey; Meyer, Hans-Jonas; Pech, Maciej; Powerski, Maciej; Omari, Jasan; Wienke, Andreas.
Afiliação
  • Surov A; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. Alexey.Surov@med.ovgu.de.
  • Meyer HJ; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Pech M; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Powerski M; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Omari J; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Wienke A; Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 36(10): 2189-2197, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34184127
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to provide data regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in rectal cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE library, EMBASE, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between DWI and metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer up to February 2021. Overall, 9 studies were included into the analysis. Number, mean value, and standard deviation of DWI parameters including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic and non-metastatic LN were extracted from the literature. The methodological quality of the studies was investigated according to the QUADAS-2 assessment. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian, and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used to account the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean DWI values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated for metastatic and non-metastatic LN. RESULTS: ADC values were reported for 1376 LN, 623 (45.3%) metastatic LN, and 754 (54.7%) non-metastatic LN. The calculated mean ADC value (× 10-3 mm2/s) of metastatic LN was 1.05, 95%CI (0.94, 1.15). The calculated mean ADC value of the non-metastatic LN was 1.17, 95%CI (1.01, 1.33). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 0.81, 95%CI (0.74, 0.89) and 0.67, 95%CI (0.54, 0.79). CONCLUSION: No reliable ADC threshold can be recommended for distinguishing of metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Linfonodos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Linfonodos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha País de publicação: Alemanha