Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of aneuploidy rates between conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection split insemination cycles.
Deng, Jie; Kuyoro, Olutunmike; Zhao, Qianying; Behr, Barry; Lathi, Ruth B.
Afiliação
  • Deng J; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Kuyoro O; Obstetric & Gynecology Department, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
  • Zhao Q; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Behr B; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
  • Lathi RB; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
F S Rep ; 1(3): 277-281, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34223256
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of insemination methods on outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) by assessing PGT-A results in embryos that derived from conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in sibling oocytes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic IVF center. PATIENTS: A total of 118 couples who underwent 131 split insemination cycles from July 2016-July 2019. INTERVENTIONS: In all cycles, sibling oocytes were allocated randomly to conventional IVF or ICSI prior to stripping. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was performed via trophectoderm biopsy and next-generation sequencing with 24-chromosome screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of euploid, aneuploid, and mosaic embryos per biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 2,129 oocytes were randomized to conventional IVF (n = 1,026) and ICSI (n = 1,103). No difference was observed in the aneuploidy rates (50.3% vs. 45.2%) and percentages of mosaic embryos (1.7% vs. 2.4%) per biopsy between conventional IVF and ICSI sibling oocytes. Percentages of different aneuploidy types and aneuploidies that involved sex chromosome abnormalities (6.2% vs. 7.2%) were similar between the two groups. In the end, the overall chance to have an euploid embryo per allocated oocyte in the two groups was similar (13.2% vs. 15.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Blastocysts created with conventional IVF and ICSI using sibling oocytes had similar rates of aneuploidy and mosaicism as examined using 24-chromosome screening. It is unlikely that conventional IVF caused significant contamination during PGT-A. We recommend conventional IVF as the preferred insemination method in PGT-A cycles, and ICSI should be indicated only in cases of male-factor infertility.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: F S Rep Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: F S Rep Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos