Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of a structured approach and virtual simulation practice to improve diagnostic reasoning.
Dekhtyar, Michael; Park, Yoon Soo; Kalinyak, Judy; Chudgar, Saumil M; Fedoriw, Kelly Bossenbroek; Johnson, Khadeja J; Knoche, Craig F; Martinez, Lisa; Mingioni, Nina; Pincavage, Amber T; Salas, Rachel; Sanfilippo, Fred; Sozio, Stephen M; Weigle, Nancy; Wood, Sarah; Zavodnick, Jillian; Stern, Scott.
Afiliação
  • Dekhtyar M; Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Park YS; Department of Health Professions Education Research, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kalinyak J; i-Human Patients, a Kaplan Company, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
  • Chudgar SM; Department of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Fedoriw KB; Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Johnson KJ; Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Education, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Knoche CF; i-Human Patients, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
  • Martinez L; Department of Integrated Medicine Science, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine at Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  • Mingioni N; Department of Internal Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Pincavage AT; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Salas R; Department of Neurology and Nursing at Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Sanfilippo F; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine and Professor of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Sozio SM; Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Weigle N; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Wood S; Department of Medical Education, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine at Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  • Zavodnick J; Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.
  • Stern S; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 9(1): 69-76, 2021 07 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34246202
OBJECTIVES: In 2015, the National Academy of Medicine IOM estimated that 12 million patients were misdiagnosed annually. This suggests that despite prolonged training in medical school and residency there remains a need to improve diagnostic reasoning education. This study evaluates a new approach. METHODS: A total of 285 medical students were enrolled in this 8 center, IRB approved trial. Students were randomized to receive training in either abdominal pain (AP) or loss of consciousness (LOC). Baseline diagnostic accuracy of the two different symptoms was assessed by completing a multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination and virtual patient encounters. Following a structured educational intervention, including a lecture on the diagnostic approach to that symptom and three virtual patient practice cases, each student was re-assessed. RESULTS: The change in diagnostic accuracy on virtual patient encounters was compared between (1) baseline and post intervention and (2) post intervention students trained in the prescribed symptom vs. the alternate symptom (controls). The completeness of the student's differential diagnosis was also compared. Comparison of proportions were conducted using χ2-tests. Mixed-effects regressions were used to examine differences accounting for case and repeated measures. Compared with baseline, both the AP and LOC groups had marked post-intervention improvements in obtaining a correct final diagnosis; a 27% absolute improvement in the AP group (p<0.001) and a 32% absolute improvement in the LOC group (p<0.001). Compared with controls (the groups trained in the alternate symptoms), the rate of correct diagnoses increased by 13% but was not statistically significant (p=0.132). The completeness and efficiency of the differential diagnoses increased by 16% (ß=0.37, p<0.001) and 17% respectively (ß=0.45, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that a virtual patient platform combined with a diagnostic reasoning framework could be used for education and diagnostic assessment and improved correct diagnosis compared with baseline performance in a simulated platform.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diagnosis (Berl) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diagnosis (Berl) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Alemanha