Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Metrics of OsteoChondral Allografts (MOCA) Group Consensus Statements on the Use of Viable Osteochondral Allograft.
Görtz, Simon; Tabbaa, Suzanne M; Jones, Deryk G; Polousky, John D; Crawford, Dennis C; Bugbee, William D; Cole, Brian J; Farr, Jack; Fleischli, James E; Getgood, Alan; Gomoll, Andreas H; Gross, Allan E; Krych, Aaron J; Lattermann, Christian; Mandelbaum, Bert R; Mandt, Peter R; Mirzayan, Raffy; Mologne, Timothy S; Provencher, Matthew T; Rodeo, Scott A; Safir, Oleg; Strauss, Eric D; Wahl, Christopher J; Williams, Riley J; Yanke, Adam B.
Afiliação
  • Görtz S; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Tabbaa SM; University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Jones DG; Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.
  • Polousky JD; Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.
  • Crawford DC; Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Bugbee WD; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Cole BJ; University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Farr J; Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.
  • Fleischli JE; Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.
  • Getgood A; Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Gomoll AH; Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA.
  • Gross AE; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Krych AJ; University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Lattermann C; Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.
  • Mandelbaum BR; Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.
  • Mandt PR; Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Mirzayan R; Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA.
  • Mologne TS; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Provencher MT; University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Rodeo SA; Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute, Jefferson, Louisiana, USA.
  • Safir O; Children's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, Texas, USA.
  • Strauss ED; Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Wahl CJ; Investigation performed at Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA), JRF Ortho, Centennial, Colorado, USA.
  • Williams RJ; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Yanke AB; University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 9(3): 2325967120983604, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34250153
BACKGROUND: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation has evolved into a first-line treatment for large chondral and osteochondral defects, aided by advancements in storage protocols and a growing body of clinical evidence supporting successful clinical outcomes and long-term survivorship. Despite the body of literature supporting OCAs, there still remains controversy and debate in the surgical application of OCA, especially where high-level evidence is lacking. PURPOSE: To develop consensus among an expert group with extensive clinical and scientific experience in OCA, addressing controversies in the treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects with OCA transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: Consensus statement. METHODS: A focus group of clinical experts on OCA cartilage restoration participated in a 3-round modified Delphi process to generate a list of statements and establish consensus. Questions and statements were initially developed on specific topics that lack scientific evidence and lead to debate and controversy in the clinical community. In-person discussion occurred where statements were not agreed on after 2 rounds of voting. After final voting, the percentage of agreement and level of consensus were characterized. A systematic literature review was performed, and the level of evidence and grade were established for each statement. RESULTS: Seventeen statements spanning surgical technique, graft matching, indications, and rehabilitation reached consensus after the final round of voting. Of the 17 statements that reached consensus, 11 received unanimous (100%) agreement, and 6 received strong (80%-99%) agreement. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of this study led to the establishment of consensus statements that provide guidance on surgical and perioperative management of OCAs. The findings also provided insights on topics requiring more research or high-quality studies to further establish consensus and provide stronger evidence.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos