Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Portuguese Version of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale: Validation in a Population of Chronic Pain Patients.
Sampaio, Rute; Cruz, Mariana; Pinho, Simão; Dias, Cláudia Camila; Weinman, John; Castro Lopes, José M.
Afiliação
  • Sampaio R; Departamento de Biomedicina, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Cruz M; Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e em Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal.
  • Pinho S; Departamento de Biomedicina, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Dias CC; Departamento de Biomedicina, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Weinman J; Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e em Serviços de Saúde (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal.
  • Castro Lopes JM; Departamento de Medicina da Comunidade, Informação e Decisão em Saúde, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (MEDCIDS), Porto, Portugal.
Front Pharmacol ; 12: 681378, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34349646
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Despite the effectiveness of pain medicines, nonadherence to prescribed medication remains a major problem faced by healthcare systems. The aim of present study was to perform the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale (INAS) for the European Portuguese language in a sample of chronic pain patients.

Methods:

A Portuguese version of the INAS scale was constructed through a process of translation, back translation, and expert's panel evaluation. A total of 133 chronic pain patients were selected from two chronic pain clinics from tertiary hospitals in Porto, Portugal. The protocol interview included the assessment of pain beliefs (PBPI), beliefs about medicine (BMQ), medication adherence (MARS-P9), and two direct questions about adherence previously validated.

Results:

The internal consistency in all subscales was α = 0.902 for testing treatment; α = 0.930 for mistrust treatment; α = 0.917 for resisting treatment; and α = 0.889 for resisting illness. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure that explained 74% of the variance. The construct validity of the INAS was shown to be adequate, with the majority of the previously defined hypotheses regarding intercorrelations with other measures confirmed.

Conclusion:

The Portuguese version of INAS could be a valuable and available instrument for Portuguese researchers and clinicians to assess the intentional nonadherence determinants during the management of chronic pain.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Portugal