Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Other Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in the Prevention of Thromboembolic Complications Among Finnish Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Hallinen, Taru; Soini, Erkki; Asseburg, Christian; Linna, Miika; Eloranta, Pia; Sintonen, Sari; Kosunen, Mikko.
Afiliação
  • Hallinen T; ESiOR Oy, Kuopio, Finland.
  • Soini E; ESiOR Oy, Kuopio, Finland.
  • Asseburg C; ESiOR Oy, Kuopio, Finland.
  • Linna M; Aalto University, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Espoo, Finland.
  • Eloranta P; Pfizer Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Sintonen S; Pfizer Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Kosunen M; Pfizer Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 13: 745-755, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34413661
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased steadily in Finland. DOACs have been shown to be cost-effective in comparison to warfarin, but published evidence of relative cost-effectiveness between DOACs is still scarce and mostly based on indirect comparisons of clinical trial evidence. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of apixaban to dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin in a Finnish setting using real-life evidence where available. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

A lifetime Markov simulation model used previously in a published Finnish assessment comparing apixaban and warfarin was modified and updated with the relative effectiveness and safety data available from the real-world NAXOS-study and representative Finnish input data for patient characteristics, event risks, mortality, resource use, costs, and quality of life. Apixaban's cost-effectiveness was assessed from health care payer perspective (using 3% per year discount rate) based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, cost per quality-adjusted life year [QALY] gained), probability of cost-effectiveness (at willingness-to-pay [WTP] of 35,000 euros/QALY), and net monetary benefit (NMB).

RESULTS:

Apixaban increased the average modelled quality-adjusted life-expectancy and reduced the average total health care costs of AF patients when compared to warfarin (+0.14 QALYs, -3691 euros), dabigatran (+0.11 QALYs, -404 euros), and rivaroxaban (+0.03 QALYs, -43 euros). The resulting NMB of apixaban versus warfarin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban was 8723, 4168, and 1129 euros, respectively. The respective probabilities of apixaban being cost-effective against each comparator were 100%, 92.7%, and 64.0%.

CONCLUSION:

In this modelling study, apixaban dominated other anticoagulants in the Finnish real-life setting.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia
...