Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Relationship Between Smoking and Pressure Injury Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Wu, Bing-Bing; Gu, Dong-Zhou; Yu, Jia-Ning; Feng, Li-Ping; Xu, Rong; Zha, Man-Li; Shen, Wang-Qin; Chen, Hong-Lin.
Afiliação
  • Wu BB; School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu.
  • Gu DZ; Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu, Zhejiang.
  • Yu JN; School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu.
  • Feng LP; Nantong University Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu.
  • Xu R; School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu.
  • Zha ML; Nursing Department of Nantong University Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu.
  • Shen WQ; School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu.
  • Chen HL; School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu.
Wound Manag Prev ; 67(9): 34-46, 2021 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34473642
BACKGROUND: Smoking is a risk factor for many diseases. PURPOSE: This study explored the relationship between current or past smoking and pressure injury (PI) risk through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The databases PubMed, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for the years between 2001 and 2020. Quality of evidence was estimated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The random effects model was applied to assess the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI); pooled adjusted OR and 95% CI, subgroup analysis, publication bias, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Fifteen (15) studies (12 retrospective and 3 prospective) comprising data on 11 304 patients were eligible for inclusion in the review. The meta-analysis demonstrated that smoking increased the risk of PI (OR = 1.498; 95% CI, 1.058-2.122), and the pooled adjusted OR (1.969) and 95% CI (1.406-2.757) confirmed this finding. Publication bias was not detected by funnel plot, Begg's test (P = .322), or Egger's test (P = .666). Subgroup analyses yielded the same observations in both retrospective (OR = 1.607; 95% CI, 1.043-2.475) and prospective (OR = 1.218; 95% CI, 0.735-2.017) studies. The results were consistent across sensitivity analyses (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.043- 2.475). Relevant heterogeneity moderators were not identified by meta-regression analysis with PI incidence (P = .466), years of patient data included (P = .637), mean patient age (P = .650), and diabetes mellitus diagnosis (P = .509). CONCLUSION: This study found that individuals who are current or formers smokers have an almost 1.5 times higher risk of PI development than do those who do not smoke.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fumar / Úlcera por Pressão Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Wound Manag Prev Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fumar / Úlcera por Pressão Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Wound Manag Prev Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos