Effects of a physiotherapist-led approach based on a biopsychosocial model for spinal disorders: protocol for a systematic review.
BMJ Open
; 11(9): e055144, 2021 09 28.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34588269
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION:
Low back pain and neck pain are among the most common musculoskeletal disorders, and their related medical costs are rising every year. Many interventions are based on the biopsychosocial (BPS) model since the cause of pain is more multifaceted. Physiotherapists have increased opportunities to perform multidisciplinary interventions alone in clinical practice due to a lack of understanding of the model and its cost. Therefore, physiotherapist-led interventions using the BPS model are important and require an updated report summarising their effectiveness. Thus, the purpose of this study will be to summarise and synthesise the effects of physiotherapist-led interventions using the BPS model for spinal disorders. METHODS ANDANALYSIS:
We will search the Web of Science, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and PEDro electronic databases, using a date range from inception to September 2021. We will include only randomised controlled trials for patients diagnosed with spinal disorders who received physiotherapist-led interventions based on the BPS model. The search will be limited to English-language publications. Pain intensity and disability are the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes are any psychological factors. We will examine the short-term, medium-term and long-term effects, and a subgroup analysis will be conducted, if possible, to investigate the role of additional physiotherapist training. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is exempt from ethical approval because it involves publicly available documents. The findings will be submitted for publication in a relevant peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021258071.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Doenças Musculoesqueléticas
/
Dor Lombar
/
Fisioterapeutas
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Aspecto:
Ethics
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
BMJ Open
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Japão