Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acute toxicity and patient-reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer.
Iizumi, Takashi; Ishikawa, Hitoshi; Sekino, Yuta; Tanaka, Keiichi; Takizawa, Daichi; Makishima, Hirokazu; Numajiri, Haruko; Mizumoto, Masashi; Nakai, Kei; Okumura, Toshiyuki; Sakurai, Hideyuki.
Afiliação
  • Iizumi T; Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Ishikawa H; QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
  • Sekino Y; Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Tanaka K; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan.
  • Takizawa D; Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Makishima H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan.
  • Numajiri H; Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Mizumoto M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi, Japan.
  • Nakai K; QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
  • Okumura T; Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Sakurai H; Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
J Med Radiat Sci ; 69(2): 198-207, 2022 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34664410
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/fraction) PBT.

METHODS:

We reviewed 289 patients with prostate cancer, of whom 73, 100, and 116 patients were treated with 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 Gy (RBE)/fraction, respectively. The endpoints were acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities and the IPSS, evaluated up to 6 months after PBT initiation.

RESULTS:

No significant differences were found in acute toxicity rates or the IPSS among the fractionation schedules. Diabetes mellitus, age, and androgen deprivation therapy were not identified as factors associated with the IPSS.

CONCLUSION:

There were no significant differences in adverse events or quality of life among the three fractionation schedules early after PBT.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Terapia com Prótons Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Med Radiat Sci Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Terapia com Prótons Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Med Radiat Sci Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão