Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Subacute Polymicrobial Bacterial Pericarditis Mimicking Tuberculous Pericarditis: A Case Report.
Carmack, Anna E; LaRocco, Allison M; Mathew, Minu; Goldberg, Hannah V; Patel, Devang M; Saleeb, Paul G.
Afiliação
  • Carmack AE; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • LaRocco AM; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Mathew M; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Goldberg HV; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Patel DM; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Saleeb PG; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Am J Case Rep ; 22: e933684, 2021 Nov 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34782592
BACKGROUND Bacterial pericarditis can present a diagnostic challenge due to the difficulty of obtaining tissue for bacterial identification. This report is of a 34-year-old man who presented with fever and cough. Diagnosis was initially delayed without a tissue sample, but the patient was later found to have polymicrobial bacterial pericarditis. CASE REPORT A 34-year-old man from the Democratic Republic of Congo presented to the emergency room with cough, fever, and night sweats. He was admitted and found to have pericardial thickening and fluid collection with calcifications. A tissue sample was not obtained for diagnosis, and he was discharged on RIPE (rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) and steroids for presumed tuberculosis pericarditis. He worsened clinically and was readmitted to the hospital with evolving pericardial effusion with air present, in addition to new pleural effusion and parenchymal consolidation. He subsequently underwent thoracotomy and pericardial biopsy. Tissue cultures and sequence-based bacterial analysis eventually revealed the presence of Prevotella oris and Fusobacterium nucleatum. He improved dramatically with appropriate antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS This report demonstrates the importance of undergoing further diagnostic work-up for bacterial pericarditis, especially in resource-rich settings. Although tuberculosis pericarditis should remain high on the differential, it is imperative not to anchor on that diagnosis. Instead, when feasible and safe, tissue biopsy should be obtained and sent for organism identification. AFB smears and cultures, Xpert MTB/RIF, and sequence-based bacterial analysis have all been used for identification. Delay in diagnosis can lead to progression of disease and unnecessary incorrect therapies.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derrame Pericárdico / Pericardite / Pericardite Tuberculosa Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am J Case Rep Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derrame Pericárdico / Pericardite / Pericardite Tuberculosa Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am J Case Rep Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos