Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of living and working in a hot environment on cognitive function in a quiet and temperature-controlled room: An oil and gas industry study.
Girard, Olivier; Gaoua, Nadia; Grantham, Justin; Knez, Wade; Walsh, Andrew; Racinais, Sebastien.
Afiliação
  • Girard O; School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Gaoua N; Research and Scientific Support Department, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sport Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
  • Grantham J; Research and Scientific Support Department, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sport Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
  • Knez W; Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre (SESRC), London South Bank University, London, UK.
  • Walsh A; Research and Scientific Support Department, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sport Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
  • Racinais S; RelatePerform, Relate Perform Ltd, Hong Kong.
Temperature (Austin) ; 8(4): 372-380, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34901319
We investigate the effects of seasonal heat stress on cognitive function in outdoor workers. Thirty-nine workers from an oil and gas industry in the Middle-East volunteered for cognitive testing before (5.30 to 7.00 am) and after (3.30 to 5.00 pm) their daily work-shift in hot (August - average daily temperature: ~41°C) and temperate (January - average daily temperature: ~22°C) seasons. While physical activity was reduced in hot compared to temperate season (average normalized acceleration: 96 ± 33 vs. 112 ± 31 × 10-3 g; -12.5 ± 4.7%; P = 0.010), the average core temperature during the work-shift was higher in the hot season (37.4 ± 0.2 vs. 37.2 ± 0.2°C; P = 0.002). Peak core temperature was 38.0 ± 0.1°C and 37.8 ± 0.1°C in hot and temperate seasons, respectively. Cognitive performance did not differ between seasons for tests of recognition memory (P = 0.169), working memory (P = 0.797) and executive function (P = 0.145), independent of testing time. Whereas there was no significant main effect of testing time for tests of recognition memory (P = 0.503) and working memory (P = 0.849), the number of problems solved on the first choice for the executive function test was lower in the afternoon than the morning (-9.2 ± 5.3%; P = 0.039). There was no season × testing time interaction for any cognitive tests (P ≥ 0.145). In the absence of hyperthermia, living and working in a hot environment does not alter cognitive function in oil and gas industry workers tested in a quiet and temperature-controlled room, with reduced clothing encumbrance (relative to work). Conclusions should not be extrapolated to more stressful situations (i.e., thermal stressor present, pronounced dehydration, noise).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Temperature (Austin) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Temperature (Austin) Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: Estados Unidos