Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of cigarette pack anti-littering messages.
Morgan, Jennifer C; Jeong, Michelle; Mendel-Sheldon, Jennifer; Noar, Seth M; Ribisl, Kurt M; Brewer, Noel T.
Afiliação
  • Morgan JC; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, United States; Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: Jennifer.Morgan@asc.upenn.edu.
  • Jeong M; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, United States; Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, United States.
  • Mendel-Sheldon J; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, United States.
  • Noar SM; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, United States; Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, United States.
  • Ribisl KM; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, United States.
  • Brewer NT; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, United States.
Addict Behav ; 126: 107184, 2022 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34906881
OBJECTIVE: Tobacco butts are the most littered item worldwide and pose a critical environmental and public health hazard. Given the positive impact of required graphic warnings on smoking, we sought to assess the impact of a policy requiring cigarette pack anti-littering messages on smokers' littering intentions. METHODS: We randomly assigned US adult smokers (n = 719) to receive labels on the side of their cigarette packs for three weeks: anti-littering messages or messages about chemicals in cigarette smoke. RESULTS: Anti-littering messages elicited higher intentions to refrain from littering in the next month compared to chemical messages (p < .05). Anti-littering messages also led to increased knowledge about cigarette butts being the most common form of litter, the number of conversations about littering, and thinking about the proper disposal of cigarettes (all p < .05). Finally, smoking from packs labeled with anti-littering messages led to fewer weeks littering from car windows compared to packs labeled with chemical messages (p < .05), but did not affect completely refraining from littering cigarette butts. Mediators of the messages' impact on littering intentions were thinking about proper cigarette butt disposal and perceived message effectiveness (both p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Policies requiring anti-littering messages on cigarette packs would raise awareness about the problem of cigarette butt litter and bolster intentions to not litter.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Produtos do Tabaco Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Addict Behav Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar / Produtos do Tabaco Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Addict Behav Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido