Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Attitudes to radiation safety and cholangiogram interpretation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a UK survey.
Siau, Keith; Webster, George; Wright, Mark; Maher, Ben; Stedman, Brian; Johnson, Gavin; Ahmad, Saqib; Tehami, Nadeem.
Afiliação
  • Siau K; Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group of Hospitals NHS Trust, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.
  • Webster G; Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Wright M; Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Maher B; Department of Hepatology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Stedman B; Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Johnson G; Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
  • Ahmad S; Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Tehami N; Department of Gastroenterology, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton-In-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol ; 12(7): 550-556, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34917311
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Fluoroscopy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) exposes staff and patients to potentially harmful ionizing radiation. We performed a UK survey to explore trainee and trainer attitudes to radiation protection and cholangiogram interpretation in ERCP.

METHODS:

An electronic 10-point survey was prospectively distributed to endoscopy unit leads, training programme directors between October and November 2019. Only UK-based ERCP trainees and trainers with hands-on procedural exposure were eligible for the survey.

RESULTS:

The survey was completed by 107 respondents (58 trainees and 49 trainers), with an estimated overall response rate of 46%. Overall, 49% of respondents were up to date with their radiation protection course, 38% were aware of European Basic safety standards directive (BSSD), 38% wore radiation protection goggles, and 40% were aware of the average radiation screening dose per ERCP procedure. Compared with trainers, trainees were less likely to routinely wear thyroid protection shields (76% vs 92%; p=0.028), have awareness of the BSSD (20% vs 49%; p=0.037) or know their average procedural radiation dosages (21% vs 63%; p<0.001). With regard to cholangiogram interpretation, only 26% had received formal training, with 97% of trainees expressing a desire for further training.

CONCLUSION:

This survey highlights a relative complacency in safety attitudes to radiation protection during ERCP. These data provide impetus to improve training and quality assurance in radiation protection, which should be regarded as a mandatory safety aspect prior to commencing hands-on ERCP training.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Frontline Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Frontline Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido