Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Success factors in high-effect, low-cost eHealth programs for patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Blok, Sebastiaan; van der Linden, Eva L; Somsen, G Aernout; Tulevski, Igor I; Winter, Michiel M; van den Born, Bert-Jan H.
Afiliação
  • Blok S; Department of Cardiology, Cardiology Centers of the Netherlands, The Netherlands.
  • van der Linden EL; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, The Netherlands.
  • Somsen GA; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Internal and Vascular Medicine, The Netherlands.
  • Tulevski II; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, The Netherlands.
  • Winter MM; Department of Cardiology, Cardiology Centers of the Netherlands, The Netherlands.
  • van den Born BH; Department of Cardiology, Cardiology Centers of the Netherlands, The Netherlands.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 28(14): 1579-1587, 2021 12 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34929044
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

eHealth programs can lower blood pressure but also drive healthcare costs. This study aims to review the evidence on the effectiveness and costs of eHealth for hypertension and assess commonalities in programs with high effect and low additional cost.

RESULTS:

Overall, the incremental decrease in systolic blood pressure using eHealth, compared to usual care, was 3.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.98-4.77) mmHg at 6 months and 5.68 (95% CI 4.77-6.59) mmHg at 12 months' follow-up. High intensity interventions were more effective, resulting in a 2.6 (95% CI 0.5-4.7) (at 6 months) and 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-5.1) (at 12 months) lower systolic blood pressure, but were also more costly, resulting in €170 (95% CI 56-284) higher costs at 6 months and €342 (95% CI 128-556) at 12 months. Programs that included a high volume of participants showed €203 (95% CI 99-307) less costs than those with a low volume at 6 months, and €525 (95% CI 299-751) at 12 months without showing a difference in systolic blood pressure. Studies that implemented eHealth as a partial replacement, rather than addition to usual care, were also less costly (€119 (95% CI -38-201 at 6 months) and €346 (95% CI 261-430 at 12 months)) without being less effective. Evidence on eHealth programs for hypertension is ambiguous, heterogeneity on effectiveness and costs is high (I2 = 56-98%).

CONCLUSION:

Effective eHealth with limited additional costs should focus on high intensity interventions, involve a large number of participants and use eHealth as a partial replacement for usual care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemedicina / Hipertensão Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Prev Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemedicina / Hipertensão Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Prev Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda