Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ScotCap - A large observational cohort study.
MacLeod, Campbell; Hudson, Jemma; Brogan, Michelle; Cotton, Seonaidh; Treweek, Shaun; MacLennan, Graeme; Watson, Angus J M.
Afiliação
  • MacLeod C; Department of Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK.
  • Hudson J; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Brogan M; Digital Health and Care Innovation Centre, Glasgow, UK.
  • Cotton S; Health Services Research Unit, The Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Treweek S; Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • MacLennan G; Health Services Research Unit, The Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Watson AJM; Department of Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK.
Colorectal Dis ; 24(4): 411-421, 2022 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34935278
AIM: The aim of this work was to evaluate the performance of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) in a lower gastrointestinal diagnostic care pathway. METHOD: This large multicentre prospective clinical evaluation recruited symptomatic patients (patients requiring investigation of symptoms suggestive of colorectal pathology) and surveillance patients (patients due to undergo surveillance colonoscopy). Patients aged 18 years or over were invited to participate and undergo CCE by a secondary-care clinician if they met the referral criteria for a colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the test completion rate (visualization of the whole colon and rectum). We also measured the need for further tests after CCE. RESULTS: A total of 733 patients were invited to take part in this evaluation, with 509 patients undergoing CCE. Of these, 316 were symptomatic patients and 193 were surveillance patients. Two hundred and twenty-eight of the 316 symptomatic patients (72%) and 137 of the 193 surveillance patients (71%) had a complete test. It was found that 118/316 (37%) of symptomatic patients required no further test following CCE, while 103/316 (33%) and 81/316 (26%) required a colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy, respectively. Fifty-three of the 193 surveillance patients (28%) required no further test following CCE, while 104/193 (54%) and 30/193 (16%) required a colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy, respectively. No patient in this evaluation was diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Two patients experienced serious adverse events - one capsule retention with obstruction and one hospital admission with dehydration due to the bowel preparation. CONCLUSION: CCE is a safe, well-tolerated diagnostic test which can reduce the proportion of patients requiring colonoscopy, but the test completion rate needs to be improved to match that of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Endoscopia por Cápsula Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Endoscopia por Cápsula Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido