Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multi-laboratory evaluation of the Illumina iSeq platform for whole genome sequencing of Salmonella, Escherichia coli and Listeria.
Mitchell, Patrick K; Wang, Leyi; Stanhope, Bryce J; Cronk, Brittany D; Anderson, Renee; Mohan, Shipra; Zhou, Lijuan; Sanchez, Susan; Bartlett, Paula; Maddox, Carol; DeShambo, Vanessa; Mani, Rinosh; Hengesbach, Lindsy M; Gresch, Sarah; Wright, Katie; Mor, Sunil; Zhang, Shuping; Shen, Zhenyu; Yan, Lifang; Mackey, Rebecca; Franklin-Guild, Rebecca; Zhang, Yan; Prarat, Melanie; Shiplett, Katherine; Ramachandran, Akhilesh; Narayanan, Sai; Sanders, Justin; Hunkapiller, Andree A; Lahmers, Kevin; Carbonello, Amanda A; Aulik, Nicole; Lim, Ailam; Cooper, Jennifer; Jones, Angelica; Guag, Jake; Nemser, Sarah M; Tyson, Gregory H; Timme, Ruth; Strain, Errol; Reimschuessel, Renate; Ceric, Olgica; Goodman, Laura B.
Afiliação
  • Mitchell PK; Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • Wang L; Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • Stanhope BJ; Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • Cronk BD; Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • Anderson R; Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • Mohan S; Bronson Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Kissimmee, FL, USA.
  • Zhou L; Bronson Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Kissimmee, FL, USA.
  • Sanchez S; Athens Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, The University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine,, GA, USA.
  • Bartlett P; Athens Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, The University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine,, GA, USA.
  • Maddox C; Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • DeShambo V; Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
  • Mani R; Michigan State University, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Hengesbach LM; Michigan State University, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Lansing, MI, USA.
  • Gresch S; University of Minnesota, Veterinary Diagnostic Lboratory, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
  • Wright K; University of Minnesota, Veterinary Diagnostic Lboratory, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
  • Mor S; University of Minnesota, Veterinary Diagnostic Lboratory, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
  • Zhang S; University of Missouri Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, Columbia, MO, USA.
  • Shen Z; University of Missouri Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, Columbia, MO, USA.
  • Yan L; Mississippi State University, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, MS, USA.
  • Mackey R; Mississippi State University, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, MS, USA.
  • Franklin-Guild R; Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • Zhang Y; Ohio Department of Agriculture, Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Reynoldsburg, OH, USA.
  • Prarat M; Ohio Department of Agriculture, Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Reynoldsburg, OH, USA.
  • Shiplett K; Ohio Department of Agriculture, Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Reynoldsburg, OH, USA.
  • Ramachandran A; Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
  • Narayanan S; Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
  • Sanders J; Oregon Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Oregon State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • Hunkapiller AA; Oregon Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Oregon State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • Lahmers K; Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  • Carbonello AA; Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  • Aulik N; University of Wisconsin-Madison Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Lim A; University of Wisconsin-Madison Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Cooper J; University of Wisconsin-Madison Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Jones A; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Guag J; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Nemser SM; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Tyson GH; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Timme R; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Strain E; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Reimschuessel R; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Ceric O; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  • Goodman LB; Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Microb Genom ; 8(2)2022 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35113783
ABSTRACT
There is a growing need for public health and veterinary laboratories to perform whole genome sequencing (WGS) for monitoring antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and protecting the safety of people and animals. With the availability of smaller and more affordable sequencing platforms coupled with well-defined bioinformatic protocols, the technological capability to incorporate this technique for real-time surveillance and genomic epidemiology has greatly expanded. There is a need, however, to ensure that data are of high quality. The goal of this study was to assess the utility of a small benchtop sequencing platform using a multi-laboratory verification approach. Thirteen laboratories were provided the same equipment, reagents, protocols and bacterial reference strains. The Illumina DNA Prep and Nextera XT library preparation kits were compared, and 2×150 bp iSeq i100 chemistry was used for sequencing. Analyses comparing the sequences produced from this study with closed genomes from the provided strains were performed using open-source programs. A detailed, step-by-step protocol is publicly available via protocols.io (https//www.protocols.io/view/iseq-bacterial-wgs-protocol-bij8kcrw). The throughput for this method is approximately 4-6 bacterial isolates per sequencing run (20-26 Mb total load). The Illumina DNA Prep library preparation kit produced high-quality assemblies and nearly complete AMR gene annotations. The Prep method produced more consistent coverage compared to XT, and when coverage benchmarks were met, nearly all AMR, virulence and subtyping gene targets were correctly identified. Because it reduces the technical and financial barriers to generating WGS data, the iSeq platform is a viable option for small laboratories interested in genomic surveillance of microbial pathogens.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salmonella / Genoma Bacteriano / Escherichia coli / Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala / Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma / Listeria Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Microb Genom Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salmonella / Genoma Bacteriano / Escherichia coli / Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala / Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma / Listeria Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Microb Genom Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos