Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Subcortical Stimulation in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Closer Look Beneath the Surface.
Greisman, Jacob D; Dadario, Nicholas B; Park, Jung; Silverstein, Justin W; D'Amico, Randy S.
Afiliação
  • Greisman JD; Department of Neurological Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, New York, USA.
  • Dadario NB; Department of Neurological Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, New York, USA.
  • Park J; Department of Neurological Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, New York, USA.
  • Silverstein JW; Department of Neurology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, New York, USA; Neuro Protective Solutions, New York, New York, USA.
  • D'Amico RS; Department of Neurological Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: rdamico8@northwell.edu.
World Neurosurg ; 161: 55-63, 2022 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35149248
BACKGROUND: Maximizing the patient's onco-functional balance is the central tenet of brain tumor surgery. Consequently, numerous surgical adjuncts have been developed to facilitate identification of the tumor-brain interface and preservation of functional anatomy. Among these, intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) with direct cortical stimulation (DCS) and subcortical stimulation (SCS) remains the gold standard for real-time, functional mapping of motor and language activity. Stimulation techniques are not standardized and vary significantly across institutions, however. This is particularly true with SCS for mapping motor function. METHODS: We reviewed the state of subcortical IONM and mapping techniques, including historical and predicate literature as well as new and emerging techniques. Here we discuss their evolution, clinical utility, and limitations to direct future research and application. RESULTS: Our evaluation of the background and current clinical use of DCS and SCS techniques and protocols and identification of current trends and limitations focuses specifically on methods of SCS, given the heterogeneity in the published literature. We suggest directions to optimize the clinical utility of these tools. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant heterogeneity in published techniques, trends support use of the Taniguchi method for SCS. Novel dynamic stimulation techniques may improve accuracy. Prospective studies to define standardized guidelines are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Monitorização Neurofisiológica Intraoperatória Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Monitorização Neurofisiológica Intraoperatória Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Assunto da revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos