Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variability of interferon-γ release assays in people at high risk of tuberculosis infection or progression to tuberculosis disease living in the United States.
Winglee, Kathryn; Hill, Andrew N; Belknap, Robert; Stout, Jason E; Ayers, Tracy L.
Afiliação
  • Winglee K; Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: nrf1@cdc.gov.
  • Hill AN; Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Belknap R; Public Health Institute at Denver Health, Denver, CO, USA.
  • Stout JE; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Ayers TL; Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 28(7): 1023.e1-1023.e7, 2022 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35183749
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Interferon-γ release assays, including T-SPOT.TB (TSPOT) and QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube (QFT), are important diagnostic tools for tuberculosis infection, but little work has been done to study the performance of these tests in populations prioritized for tuberculosis testing in the United States, especially those other than health care personnel.

METHODS:

Participants were enrolled as part of a large, prospective cohort of people at high risk of tuberculosis infection or progression to tuberculosis disease. All participants were administered a tuberculin skin test, TSPOT, and QFT test. A subset of participants had their QFT (n = 919) and TSPOT (n = 885) tests repeated when they returned to get their tuberculin skin test read 2 to 3 days later (repeat study). A total of 531 participants had a TSPOT performed twice on the same sample taken at the same time (split study).

RESULTS:

The QFT repeat test interpretations were discordant (one test positive and the other negative) for 6.4% of participants (59 of 919), and the TSPOT tests were discordant for 60 of 885 participants in the repeat study (6.8%) and 41 of 531 participants in the split study (7.7%). There was a high degree of variability in the quantitative test results for both QFT and TSPOT, and discordance was not associated with both test results being near the established cut-offs. Furthermore, the proportion of discordance was similar when comparing participants in both the TSPOT repeat and TSPOT split studies.

DISCUSSION:

Both QFT and TSPOT were 6% to 8% discordant. The results should be interpreted with caution, particularly when seeing a conversion or reversion in serial testing.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose / Tuberculose Latente Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Microbiol Infect Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / MICROBIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tuberculose / Tuberculose Latente Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Microbiol Infect Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / MICROBIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article