Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Alternative to prophylactic antibiotics for the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: multicentre, open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.
Harding, Chris; Mossop, Helen; Homer, Tara; Chadwick, Thomas; King, William; Carnell, Sonya; Lecouturier, Jan; Abouhajar, Alaa; Vale, Luke; Watson, Gillian; Forbes, Rebecca; Currer, Stephanie; Pickard, Robert; Eardley, Ian; Pearce, Ian; Thiruchelvam, Nikesh; Guerrero, Karen; Walton, Katherine; Hussain, Zahid; Lazarowicz, Henry; Ali, Ased.
Afiliação
  • Harding C; Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Mossop H; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, William Leech Building, The Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Homer T; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Chadwick T; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • King W; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Carnell S; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Lecouturier J; Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Abouhajar A; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Vale L; Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Watson G; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Forbes R; Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Currer S; Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Pickard R; Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Eardley I; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, William Leech Building, The Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Pearce I; Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK.
  • Thiruchelvam N; Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Guerrero K; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
  • Walton K; Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
  • Hussain Z; Department of Microbiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Lazarowicz H; Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, UK.
  • Ali A; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
BMJ ; 376: e068229, 2022 03 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35264408
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To test and compare the efficacy of methenamine hippurate for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections with the current standard prophylaxis of daily low dose antibiotics.

DESIGN:

Multicentre, open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

SETTING:

Eight centres in the UK, recruiting from June 2016 to June 2018.

PARTICIPANTS:

Women aged ≥18 years with recurrent urinary tract infections, requiring prophylactic treatment.

INTERVENTIONS:

Random assignment (11, using permuted blocks of variable length via a web based system) to receive antibiotic prophylaxis or methenamine hippurate for 12 months. Treatment allocation was not masked and crossover between arms was allowed. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Absolute difference in incidence of symptomatic, antibiotic treated, urinary tract infections during treatment. A patient and public involvement group predefined the non-inferiority margin as one episode of urinary tract infection per person year. Analyses performed in a modified intention-to-treat population comprised all participants observed for at least six months.

RESULTS:

Participants were randomly assigned to antibiotic prophylaxis (n=120) or methenamine hippurate (n=120). The modified intention-to-treat analysis comprised 205 (85%) participants (antibiotics, n=102 (85%); methenamine hippurate, n=103 (86%)). Incidence of antibiotic treated urinary tract infections during the 12 month treatment period was 0.89 episodes per person year (95% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.12) in the antibiotics group and 1.38 (1.05 to 1.72) in the methenamine hippurate group, with an absolute difference of 0.49 (90% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.84) confirming non-inferiority. Adverse reactions were reported by 34/142 (24%) in the antibiotic group and 35/127 (28%) in the methenamine group and most reactions were mild.

CONCLUSION:

Non-antibiotic prophylactic treatment with methenamine hippurate might be appropriate for women with a history of recurrent episodes of urinary tract infections, informed by patient preferences and antibiotic stewardship initiatives, given the demonstration of non-inferiority to daily antibiotic prophylaxis seen in this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN70219762.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Urinárias / Antibioticoprofilaxia / Hipuratos / Metenamina / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Urinárias / Antibioticoprofilaxia / Hipuratos / Metenamina / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido
...