Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA for the Detection of Heart Allograft Injury: The Impact of the Timing of the Liquid Biopsy.
Verhoeven, Jeroen G H P; Hesselink, Dennis A; Peeters, Annemiek M A; de Jonge, Evert; von der Thüsen, Jan H; van Schaik, Ron H N; Matic, Maja; Baan, Carla C; Manintveld, O C; Boer, Karin.
Afiliação
  • Verhoeven JGHP; Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Hesselink DA; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Peeters AMA; Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • de Jonge E; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • von der Thüsen JH; Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • van Schaik RHN; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Matic M; Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Baan CC; Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Manintveld OC; Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Boer K; Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Transpl Int ; 35: 10122, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35387397
Background: In heart transplant recipients, donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) is a potential biomarker for acute rejection (AR), in that increased values may indicate rejection. For the assessment of ddcfDNA as new biomarker for rejection, blood plasma sampling around the endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) seems a practical approach. To evaluate the effect of the EMB procedure on ddcfDNA values, ddcfDNA values before the EMB were pairwise compared to ddcfDNA values after the EMB. We aimed at evaluating whether it matters whether the ddcfDNA sampling is done before or after the EMB-procedure. Methods: Plasma samples from heart transplant recipients were obtained pre-EMB and post-EMB. A droplet digital PCR method was used for measuring ddcfDNA, making use of single-nucleotide polymorphisms that allowed both relative quantification, as well as absolute quantification of ddcfDNA. Results: Pairwise comparison of ddcfDNA values pre-EMB with post-EMB samples (n = 113) showed significantly increased ddcfDNA concentrations and ddcfDNA% in post-EMB samples: an average 1.28-fold increase in ddcfDNA concentrations and a 1.31-fold increase in ddcfDNA% was observed (p = 0.007 and p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion: The EMB procedure causes iatrogenic injury to the allograft that results in an increase in ddcfDNA% and ddcfDNA concentrations. For the assessment of ddcfDNA as marker for AR, collection of plasma samples before the EMB procedure is therefore essential.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Coração / Ácidos Nucleicos Livres Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Transpl Int Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Coração / Ácidos Nucleicos Livres Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Transpl Int Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Suíça