Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation-induced prostate swelling during SBRT of the prostate.
Vanhanen, Antti; Reinikainen, Petri; Kapanen, Mika.
Afiliação
  • Vanhanen A; Department of Oncology, Unit of Radiotherapy, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Reinikainen P; Department of Medical Physics, Medical Imaging Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Kapanen M; Department of Oncology, Unit of Radiotherapy, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Acta Oncol ; 61(6): 698-704, 2022 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35435111
BACKGROUND: Reduced planning target volume (PTV) margins are commonly used in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of the prostate. In addition, MR-only treatment planning is becoming more common in prostate radiotherapy and compared to CT-MRI-based contouring results in notable smaller clinical target volume (CTV). Tight PTV margins coupled with MR-only planning raise a concern whether the margins are adequate enough to cover possible volumetric changes of the prostate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the volumetric change of the prostate and its effect on PTV margin during 5x7.25 Gy SBRT of the prostate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients were included in the study. Three MRI scans, first prior to treatment (baseline), second after third fraction (mid-treatment) and third after fifth fraction (end-treatment) were acquired for each patient. Prostate contours were delineated on each MRI scan and used to assess the prostate volume and maximum prostate diameter on left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) directions at baseline, mid- and end-treatment. RESULTS: Median (IQR) change in the prostate volume relative to the baseline was 12.0% (3.1, 17.7) and 9.2% (2.0, 18.9) at the mid- and end-treatment, respectively, and the change was statistically significant (p = 0.004 and p = 0.020, respectively). Compared to the baseline, median increase in the maximum LR, SI and AP prostate diameters were 0.8, 2.3 and 1.5 mm at mid-treatment, and 0.5, 2.5 and 2.3 mm at end-treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: If prostate contouring is based solely on MRI (e.g., in MR-only protocol), additional margin of 1-2 mm should be considered to account for prostate swelling. The study is part of clinical trial NCT02319239.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Radiocirurgia Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Acta Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Radiocirurgia Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Acta Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia País de publicação: Reino Unido