Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Postlaunch evidence generation practices among health technology assessment bodies in Europe.
Puñal-Riobóo, Janet; Varela-Lema, Leonor; Guilhaume, Chantal; Galbraith, Margaret; Bélorgey, Chantal; Faraldo, Maria José; Meillassoux, Amélie.
Afiliação
  • Puñal-Riobóo J; Galician Health Knowledge Agency (AVALIA-T, ACIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Varela-Lema L; Preventive Medicine and Public Health Department, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Guilhaume C; Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Saint-Denis, France.
  • Galbraith M; Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Saint-Denis, France.
  • Bélorgey C; Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Saint-Denis, France.
  • Faraldo MJ; Galician Health Knowledge Agency (AVALIA-T, ACIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Meillassoux A; Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Saint-Denis, France.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 38(1): e33, 2022 Apr 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35437135
OBJECTIVES: The term Postlaunch Evidence Generation (PLEG) refers to evidence generated after the launch or licensing of a health technology. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the implementation of these practices in the European Union in order to explore cross-border cooperation opportunities. METHODS: In December 2019, a survey composed of nine closed-ended questions with multiple choice answers about the PLEG practices in each country was sent to all twenty-five dedicated work package (WP5B) partners of the European Network of Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3. In addition to the survey, the national practices were discussed during a face-to-face meeting with WP5B partners. RESULTS: Twelve Health TechnologyAssessment (HTA) bodies completed the survey. Of these, eleven reported procedures in place for official requests for PLEGs in their remit. In the large majority of cases, the requests are made at the time of the assessment/appraisal. Several agencies participate in the definition of the scope of the PLEG or review of its protocol. Data collection and analysis mainly lie with companies for pharmaceuticals, whereas it is more the responsibility of the HTA bodies for medical devices. Only one agency owns the data and is able to exchange them without asking permission. CONCLUSIONS: Most agencies recommend European collaboration on PLEG commence once the evidence gaps have been defined or during the production of the HTA report in the case of European joint assessment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_technology_assessment / Qualitative_research País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_technology_assessment / Qualitative_research País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha País de publicação: Reino Unido