Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3D printed murine phantom.
Biglin, Emma R; Aitkenhead, Adam H; Price, Gareth J; Chadwick, Amy L; Santina, Elham; Williams, Kaye J; Kirkby, Karen J.
Afiliação
  • Biglin ER; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, 3rd floor Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Oak Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK. Emma.biglin@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.
  • Aitkenhead AH; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, 3rd floor Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Oak Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
  • Price GJ; Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Chadwick AL; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, 3rd floor Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Oak Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
  • Santina E; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Williams KJ; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, 3rd floor Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Oak Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
  • Kirkby KJ; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 6826, 2022 04 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35474242
ABSTRACT
Preclinical radiation research lacks standardized dosimetry procedures that provide traceability to a primary standard. Consequently, ensuring accuracy and reproducibility between studies is challenging. Using 3D printed murine phantoms we undertook a dosimetry audit of Xstrahl Small Animal Radiation Research Platforms (SARRPs) installed at 7 UK centres. The geometrically realistic phantom accommodated alanine pellets and Gafchromic EBT3 film for simultaneous measurement of the dose delivered and the dose distribution within a 2D plane, respectively. Two irradiation scenarios were developed (1) a 10 × 10 mm2 static field targeting the pelvis, and (2) a 5 × 5 mm2 90° arc targeting the brain. For static fields, the absolute difference between the planned dose and alanine measurement across all centres was 4.1 ± 4.3% (mean ± standard deviation), with an overall range of - 2.3 to 10.5%. For arc fields, the difference was - 1.2% ± 6.1%, with a range of - 13.1 to 7.7%. EBT3 dose measurements were greater than alanine by 2.0 ± 2.5% and 3.5 ± 6.0% (mean ± standard deviation) for the static and arc fields, respectively. 2D dose distributions showed discrepancies to the planned dose at the field edges. The audit demonstrates that further work on preclinical radiotherapy quality assurance processes is merited.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Impressão Tridimensional Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Impressão Tridimensional Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido
...