Carica papaya Represents a New Host of 16SrI-B Subgroup Phytoplasma Associated with Yellow Symptoms in China.
Plant Dis
; 2022 May 17.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35581910
ABSTRACT
Carica papaya Linn, belonging to the Caricaceae family, is an economic and medicinal plant, which is widely cultivated in tropical and subtropical countries (Soib et al., 2020). Beginning in 2021, abnormal symptoms of Carica papaya exhibiting leaf yellow, crinkle and leaflet were found in Wanning city of Hainan Province, China. The diseased symptoms of the plant, with about 20 % incidence in the sampling regions, were suspected to be induced by phytoplasma, a phloem-limited and could not be cultured in vitro prokaryotic pathogen. Total DNAs were extracted from 0.10 g fresh leaves of symptomatic or asymptomatic Carica papaya using CTAB DNA extraction method (Doyle and Doyle, 1990). PCR reactions were performed using primers R16mF2/R16mR1 (Gundersen and Lee, 1996), secAfor1/secArev3 (Hodgetts et al., 2008) and AYgroelF/AYgroelR (Mitrovic et al., 2011) specific for phytoplasma 16S rRNA, secA and groEL gene fragments. PCR products of the 16S rRNA, secA and groEL gene target fragments of phytoplasma were obtained from the DNA of eight diseased Carica papaya samples whereas not from the DNA of the asymptomatic plant samples. The PCR amplicons of the three genes were cloned and sequenced by Biotechnology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and the sequences data were deposited in GenBank. The 16S rRNA, secAgroEL gene of phytoplasma was in length of 1326 (GenBank accession OL625608), 716 (OL630087) and 1300 (OL630088) bp separately, putatively encoding 238 (secA) and 432 (groEL) amino acids sequence. The phytoplasma strain was named as Carica papaya yellow phytoplasma (CpY), CpY-hnwn strain. A blast search based on 16Sr RNA gene of CpY-hnwn showed 100 % sequence identity with that of 16SrI aster yellows group members (16SrI-B subgroup), such as Onion yellows phytoplasma strain OY-M (AP006628), Chinaberry witches'-broom phytoplasma (CWB) strain CWB-hnsy1 (KP662119) and CWB-hnsy2 (KP662120), Rapeseed phyllody phytoplasma isolate RP166 (CP055264). RFLP analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene fragment of CpY-hnwn was performed by the interactive online phytoplasma classification tool iPhyClassifier (Zhao et al., 2009) indicated that the phytoplasma strain is a member of 16SrI-B subgroup. Blast search based on secA gene of CpY-hnwn showed 100 % sequence identity with that of CWB strains CWB-gdgz (KP662182), CWB-jxnc (KP662180) and CWB-fjya (KP662178) belonging to 16SrI-B subgroup. Blast search based on groEL gene of CpY-hnwn showed 99.77 % sequence identity with that of mulberry dwarf phytoplasma (AB124809) and 99.69 % sequence identity with that of Onion yellows phytoplasma strain OY-M (AP006628) and Rapeseed phyllody phytoplasma isolate RP166 (CP055264). Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene fragments performed by MEGA 7.0 employing neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1000 bootstrap value (Kumar et al., 2016; Felsenstein, 1985) indicated that the CpY-hnwn phytoplasma strain was clustered into one clade with the phytoplasma strains of OY-M (AP006628), RP166 (CP055264), CWB-hnsy1 (KP662119), CWB-hnsy2 (KP662120) and areca palm yellow leaf (KF728948), with 100 % bootstrap value. To our knowledge, this is the first report that a 16SrI-B subgroup phytoplasma infects Carica papaya in Hainan Province, a tropical island of China. Carica papaya was previously reported to be infected by 16SrXII-O subgroup phytoplasmas in Nigeria (Kazeem et al., 2021), 16SrII-U subgroup in Hainan Province of China (Yang et al., 2016). The findings in this study indicated that one plant couldthe phytoplasmas belonging to different 16Sr groups, which would be beneficial to the specific detection of the pathogens and the epidemic monitoring of the related diseases. References Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. 1990. Focus 12 13-15. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Evolution 39 783-791. Gundersen, D.E. and Lee, I.M. 1996. Phytopath. Medit. 35 144-151. Hodgetts, J., et al. 2008. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58 1826-1837. Kazeem, S.A., et al. 2021. Crop Prot. 148 105731. Kumar, S., et al. 2016. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33 1870-1874. Mitrovic, J., et al. 2011. Ann. Appl. Biol. 159 41-48. Soib, H.H., et al. 2020. Molecules, 25 517. Yang, Y., et al. 2016. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66 3485-3491. Zhao, Y., et al. 2009. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59 2582-2593.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Plant Dis
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article