Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in the Propensity of Different Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants to Be Disseminated via Transformation in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.
Hanafy, Zahra; Osborne, Jason A; Miller, William G; Parker, Craig T; Olson, Jonathan W; Jackson, James H; Kathariou, Sophia.
Afiliação
  • Hanafy Z; Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
  • Osborne JA; Department of Statistics, College of Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
  • Miller WG; Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, CA 94710, USA.
  • Parker CT; Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, CA 94710, USA.
  • Olson JW; Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
  • Jackson JH; Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
  • Kathariou S; Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Microorganisms ; 10(6)2022 Jun 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35744712
ABSTRACT
Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are leading zoonotic foodborne pathogens, and the drugs of choice for human campylobacteriosis are macrolides (e.g., erythromycin) and fluoroquinolones. C. jejuni and C. coli are naturally competent for transformation via naked DNA uptake, but potential differences in transformation frequency (TF) for different antimicrobial resistance (AMR) markers remain poorly understood. We determined TFs for resistance to different antibiotics using as recipient a derivative of C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (strain SNCM) with donor DNA from multidrug-resistant C. jejuni or C. coli. TF for nalidixic acid resistance ranked significantly highest (~1.4 × 10-3), followed by resistance to streptomycin and gentamicin. Tetracycline resistance via chromosomal tet(O) was less commonly transferred (~7.6 × 10-7), while transformation to erythromycin resistance was rare (≤4.7 × 10-8). We also determined TFs with the contemporary poultry-derived strains C. jejuni FSIS 11810577 and C. coli FSIS 1710488 as recipients. TFs to nalidixic acid and streptomycin resistance remained the highest (~7 × 10-4). However, TF for gentamicin resistance was remarkably low in certain recipient-donor combinations, while average TF for erythromycin resistance was noticeably higher (~3 × 10-6) than with SNCM. Findings from this experimental model provide insights into factors that may impact transformation-mediated transfer of AMR leading to AMR dissemination in the agricultural ecosystem.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Microorganisms Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Microorganisms Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos