Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Challenges in managing, sustaining, and assessing closed point of dispensing sites: Findings from a qualitative study.
Rebmann, Terri; Foerst, Kyle; Charney, Rachel L; Mazzara, Rachel L; Sandcork, Jessica.
Afiliação
  • Rebmann T; Institute for Biosecurity, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
  • Foerst K; Saint Louis County Department of Public Health, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
  • Charney RL; Institute for Biosecurity, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
  • Mazzara RL; Division of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
  • Sandcork J; Institute for Biosecurity, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 17(7): e0271037, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35901033
ABSTRACT
Most U.S. public health agencies rely upon closed points of dispensing (PODs) to aid in medical countermeasure (MCM) distribution. However, few studies have focused on how to assess closed POD preparedness and none have examined best practices for managing sites once they have been recruited. This study involved qualitative interviews with U.S. disaster planners to elucidate their approaches and challenges to managing, sustaining, and assessing existing closed POD sites. In all, 16 disaster planners participated. Common management practices included frequent communication with sites, providing formal and informal training, and assisting with POD exercises. Very few jurisdictions reported doing formal assessments of closed POD sites. The largest challenges identified were staff turnover and keeping sites engaged, sometimes leading to sites voluntarily withdrawing or needing to be removed from being a closed POD. Frequent communication and building partnerships with closed POD site personnel were recommended to maintain and sustain existing sites. Formal and informal assessments will provide assurance of deployment readiness. Closed POD management is a challenging, but essential process to ensure readiness to deploy. Practices outlined by this study can be implemented to enhance closed POD network management at other jurisdictions. This should increase the ability to distribute MCMs rapidly during a future event, contributing to stronger community resilience. Public health officials should continue expanding and improving closed POD networks to enable MCM delivery and minimize morbidity and mortality related to mass casualty events.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento em Desastres / Incidentes com Feridos em Massa / Contramedidas Médicas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento em Desastres / Incidentes com Feridos em Massa / Contramedidas Médicas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...