Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement According to the Initial and Subsequent Valve Type.
Landes, Uri; Richter, Ilan; Danenberg, Haim; Kornowski, Ran; Sathananthan, Janarthanan; De Backer, Ole; Søndergaard, Lars; Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed; Yoon, Sung-Han; Makkar, Raj R; Thiele, Holger; Kim, Won-Keun; Hamm, Christian; Buzzatti, Nicola; Montorfano, Matteo; Ludwig, Sebastian; Schofer, Niklas; Voigtlaender, Lisa; Guerrero, Mayra; El Sabbagh, Abdallah; Rodés-Cabau, Josep; Mesnier, Jules; Okuno, Taishi; Pilgrim, Thomas; Fiorina, Claudia; Colombo, Antonio; Mangieri, Antonio; Eltchaninoff, Helene; Nombela-Franco, Luis; Van Wiechen, Maarten P H; Van Mieghem, Nicolas M; Tchétché, Didier; Schoels, Wolfgang H; Kullmer, Matthias; Barbanti, Marco; Tamburino, Corrado; Sinning, Jan-Malte; Al-Kassou, Baravan; Perlman, Gidon Y; Ielasi, Alfonso; Fraccaro, Chiara; Tarantini, Giuseppe; De Marco, Federico; Witberg, Guy; Redwood, Simon R; Lisko, John C; Babaliaros, Vasilis C; Laine, Mika; Nerla, Roberto; Finkelstein, Ariel.
Afiliação
  • Landes U; Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: uri.landes@gmail.com.
  • Richter I; Rabin Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  • Danenberg H; Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  • Kornowski R; Rabin Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  • Sathananthan J; Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul's and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • De Backer O; Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Søndergaard L; Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Abdel-Wahab M; Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Yoon SH; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Makkar RR; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Thiele H; Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Kim WK; Kerckhoff Heart Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
  • Hamm C; Kerckhoff Heart Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
  • Buzzatti N; San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Montorfano M; San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Ludwig S; University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Schofer N; University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Voigtlaender L; University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Guerrero M; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • El Sabbagh A; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Rodés-Cabau J; Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
  • Mesnier J; Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
  • Okuno T; University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Pilgrim T; University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Fiorina C; Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
  • Colombo A; Invasive Cardiology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
  • Mangieri A; Invasive Cardiology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
  • Eltchaninoff H; Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, U1096, CHU Rouen, Department of Cardiology, Rouen, France.
  • Nombela-Franco L; Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
  • Van Wiechen MPH; Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Van Mieghem NM; Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Tchétché D; Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
  • Schoels WH; Herzzentrum Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany.
  • Kullmer M; Herzzentrum Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany.
  • Barbanti M; A.O.U. Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  • Tamburino C; A.O.U. Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  • Sinning JM; University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Al-Kassou B; University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Perlman GY; Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Ielasi A; S. Ambrogio Cardio-Thoracic Center, Milan, Italy.
  • Fraccaro C; University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Tarantini G; University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • De Marco F; IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
  • Witberg G; Rabin Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  • Redwood SR; St. Thomas' Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.
  • Lisko JC; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Babaliaros VC; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Laine M; Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Nerla R; Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy.
  • Finkelstein A; Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 15(15): 1543-1554, 2022 08 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35926921
BACKGROUND: As transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) replacement is increasingly used in patients with longer life expectancy, a sizable proportion will require redo TAV replacement (TAVR). The unique configuration of balloon-expandable TAV (bTAV) vs a self-expanding TAV (sTAV) potentially affects TAV-in-TAV outcome. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to better inform prosthesis selection, TAV-in-TAV outcomes were assessed according to the type of initial and subsequent TAV. METHODS: Patients from the Redo-TAVR registry were analyzed using propensity weighting according to their initial valve type (bTAV [n = 115] vs sTAV [n = 106]) and subsequent valve type (bTAV [n = 130] vs sTAV [n = 91]). RESULTS: Patients with failed bTAVs presented later (vs sTAV) (4.9 ± 2.1 years vs 3.7 ± 2.3 years; P < 0.001), with smaller effective orifice area (1.0 ± 0.7 cm2 vs 1.3 ± 0.8 cm2; P = 0.018) and less frequent dominant regurgitation (16.2% vs 47.3%; P < 0.001). Mortality at 30 days was 2.3% (TAV-in-bTAV) vs 0% (TAV-in-sTAV) (P = 0.499) and 1.7% (bTAV-in-TAV) vs 1.0% (sTAV-in-TAV) (P = 0.612); procedural safety was 72.6% (TAV-in-bTAV) vs 71.2% (TAV-in-sTAV) (P = 0.817) and 73.2% (bTAV-in-TAV) vs 76.5% (sTAV-in-TAV) (P = 0.590). Device success was similar according to initial valve type but higher with subsequent sTAV vs bTAV (77.2% vs 64.3%; P = 0.045), primarily because of lower residual gradients (10.3 mm Hg [8.9-11.7 mm Hg] vs 15.2 mm Hg [13.2-17.1 mm Hg]; P < 0.001). Residual regurgitation (moderate or greater) was similar after bTAV-in-TAV and sTAV-in-TAV (5.7%) and nominally higher after TAV-in-bTAV (9.1%) vs TAV-in-sTAV (4.4%) (P = 0.176). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, no association was observed between TAV type and redo TAVR safety or mortality, yet subsequent sTAV was associated with higher device success because of lower redo gradients. These findings are preliminary, and more data are needed to guide valve choice for redo TAVR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos