Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomized Study of Intravenous Hydromorphone Versus Intravenous Acetaminophen for Older Adult Patients with Acute Severe Pain.
Kolli, Shilpa; Friedman, Benjamin W; Latev, Alex; Chang, Andrew K; Naeem, Farnia; Feliciano, Carmen; Afrifa, Freda; Walker, Christopher; Izzo, Al; Irizarry, Eddie.
Afiliação
  • Kolli S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore, Bronx, NY. Electronic address: shilpa.r.kolli@gmail.com.
  • Friedman BW; Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore, Bronx, NY.
  • Latev A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore, Bronx, NY.
  • Chang AK; Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore, Bronx, NY.
  • Naeem F; Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY.
  • Feliciano C; Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore, Bronx, NY.
  • Afrifa F; Pharmacy Department, Montefiore, Bronx, NY.
  • Walker C; Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore, Bronx, NY.
  • Izzo A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore, Bronx, NY.
  • Irizarry E; Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore, Bronx, NY.
Ann Emerg Med ; 80(5): 432-439, 2022 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35965162
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

We conducted a randomized study to compare the efficacy and adverse event profile of 1,000 mg of intravenous acetaminophen to that of 0.5 mg of intravenous hydromorphone among patients aged 65 years or more with acute pain of severity that was sufficient enough to warrant intravenous opioids.

METHODS:

This randomized comparative effectiveness study with 162 participants was conducted in 2 urban emergency departments (EDs). The primary outcome was an improvement in a 0 to 10 pain scale from baseline to 60 minutes later. Secondary outcomes included the need for additional analgesic medication and adverse events that were attributable to the investigational medication. The minimum clinically important difference was an improvement of 1.3 on the 0 to 10 pain scale.

RESULTS:

The median baseline pain score was 10 (interquartile range 8 to 10) in both the groups. By 60 minutes, patients taking acetaminophen improved by 3.6 (standard deviation 2.9) on the 0 to 10 pain scale, whereas patients taking hydromorphone improved by 4.6 (standard deviation 3.3) (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference of 1.0 was 0.1 to 2.0). Additional analgesic medications were required for 37 (46%) of 81 patients taking acetaminophen and 31 (38%) of 81 patients taking hydromorphone (95% CI for the rounded difference of 7% was -8% to 23%). Adverse events were reported by 6 (7%) of 81 patients taking acetaminophen and 10 (12%) of 81 patients taking hydromorphone (95% CI for the difference of 5% was -4% to 14%) and included dizziness, drowsiness, headache, and nausea.

CONCLUSION:

Although 0.5 mg of the intravenously administered hydromorphone was statistically superior to 1,000 mg of intravenous acetaminophen administered in older patients with acute severe pain in the ED, this difference was not clinically significant. Regardless of the medication received, many participants experienced minimal or incomplete pain relief.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hidromorfona / Dor Aguda Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Emerg Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hidromorfona / Dor Aguda Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Emerg Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article