Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Standard vs Enhanced Self-measurement of Blood Pressure Paired With a Connected Smartphone Application: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Pletcher, Mark J; Fontil, Valy; Modrow, Madelaine Faulkner; Carton, Thomas; Chamberlain, Alanna M; Todd, Jonathan; O'Brien, Emily C; Sheer, Amy; Vittinghoff, Eric; Park, Soo; Orozco, Jaime; Lin, Feng; Maeztu, Carlos; Wozniak, Gregory; Rakotz, Michael; Shay, Christina M; Cooper-DeHoff, Rhonda M.
Afiliação
  • Pletcher MJ; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
  • Fontil V; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
  • Modrow MF; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
  • Carton T; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
  • Chamberlain AM; Louisiana Public Health Institute, New Orleans.
  • Todd J; Departments of Quantitative Health Sciences and Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • O'Brien EC; OCHIN, Portland, Oregon.
  • Sheer A; Duke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Vittinghoff E; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville.
  • Park S; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
  • Orozco J; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
  • Lin F; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
  • Maeztu C; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
  • Rakotz M; American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Shay CM; American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Cooper-DeHoff RM; Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut.
JAMA Intern Med ; 182(10): 1025-1034, 2022 10 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35969408
ABSTRACT
Importance Self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) with commercially available connected smartphone applications may help patients effectively use SMBP measurements.

Objective:

To determine if enhanced SMBP paired with a connected smartphone application was superior to standard SMBP for blood pressure (BP) reduction or patient satisfaction. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

This randomized clinical trial was conducted among 23 health systems participating in PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, and included patients who reported having uncontrolled BP at their last clinic visit, a desire to lower their BP, and a smartphone. Enrollment and randomization occurred from August 3, 2019, to December 31, 2020, which was followed by 6 months of follow-up for each patient. Analysis commenced shortly thereafter.

Interventions:

Eligible participants were randomly assigned to enhanced SMBP using a device that paired with a connected smartphone application (enhanced) or a standard device (standard). Participants received their device in the mail, along with web-based educational materials and phone-based support as needed. No clinician engagement was undertaken, and the study provided no special mechanisms for delivering measurements to clinicians for use in BP management. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

Reduction in systolic BP, defined as the difference between clinic BP at baseline and the most recent clinic BP extracted from electronic health records at 6 months.

Results:

Enrolled participants (1051 enhanced [50.0%] vs 1050 standard [50.0%]; 1191 women [56.7%]) were mostly middle-aged or older (mean [SD] age, 58 [13] years), nearly a third were Black or Hispanic (645 [31%]), and most were relatively comfortable using technology (mean [SD], 4.1 [1.1] of 5). The mean (SD) change in systolic BP from baseline to 6 months was -10.8 (18) mm Hg vs -10.6 (18) mm Hg (enhanced vs standard adjusted difference, -0.19 mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.83 to 1.44; P = .81). Secondary outcomes were mostly null, except for documented attainment of BP control to lower than 140/<90 mm Hg, which occurred in 32% enhanced vs 29% standard groups (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.34). Most participants were very likely to recommend their SMBP device to a friend (70% vs 69%). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that enhanced SMBP paired with a smartphone application is not superior to standard SMBP for BP reduction or patient satisfaction. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03796689.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aplicativos Móveis / Hipertensão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Intern Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aplicativos Móveis / Hipertensão Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Intern Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article