Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Building a synthesis of economic costs of biological invasions in New Zealand.
Bodey, Thomas W; Carter, Zachary T; Haubrock, Phillip J; Cuthbert, Ross N; Welsh, Melissa J; Diagne, Christophe; Courchamp, Franck.
Afiliação
  • Bodey TW; School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Carter ZT; School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
  • Haubrock PJ; School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Cuthbert RN; Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany.
  • Welsh MJ; Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia, Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic.
  • Diagne C; GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Courchamp F; School of Biological Sciences, The Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
PeerJ ; 10: e13580, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35990909
ABSTRACT
Biological invasions are a major component of anthropogenic environmental change, incurring substantial economic costs across all sectors of society and ecosystems. There have been recent syntheses of costs for a number of countries using the newly compiled InvaCost database, but New Zealand-a country renowned for its approach to invasive species management-has so far not been examined. Here we analyse reported economic damage and management costs incurred by biological invasions in New Zealand from 1968 to 2020. In total, US$69 billion (NZ$97 billion) is currently reported over this ∼50-year period, with approximately US$9 billion of this considered highly reliable, observed (c.f. projected) costs. Most (82%) of these observed economic costs are associated with damage, with comparatively little invested in management (18%). Reported costs are increasing over time, with damage averaging US$120 million per year and exceeding management expenditure in all decades. Where specified, most reported costs are from terrestrial plants and animals, with damages principally borne by primary industries such as agriculture and forestry. Management costs are more often associated with interventions by authorities and stakeholders. Relative to other countries present in the InvaCost database, New Zealand was found to spend considerably more than expected from its Gross Domestic Product on pre- and post-invasion management costs. However, some known ecologically (c.f. economically) impactful invasive species are notably absent from estimated damage costs, and management costs are not reported for a number of game animals and agricultural pathogens. Given these gaps for known and potentially damaging invaders, we urge improved cost reporting at the national scale, including improving public accessibility through increased access and digitisation of records, particularly in overlooked socioeconomic sectors and habitats. This also further highlights the importance of investment in management to curtail future damages across all sectors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Espécies Introduzidas Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Espécies Introduzidas Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia