Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of low-frequency contact ultrasonic debridement with and without polyhexamethylene biguanide in hard-to-heal leg ulcers: an RCT.
Vallejo, Alison; Wallis, Marianne; McMillan, David.
Afiliação
  • Vallejo A; Wound Solutions Clinic, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, The University of the Sunshine Coast, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, Australia.
  • Wallis M; Wound Solutions Clinic, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, The University of the Sunshine Coast, Locked Bag 4, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, Australia.
  • McMillan D; INFLAME Biomedical Research Cluster, School of Health and Sports Sciences, The University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, Australia.
J Wound Care ; 31(8): 670-681, 2022 Aug 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36001700
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The primary aim of this research was to investigate the combination effect of polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) and low-frequency contact ultrasonic debridement (LFCUD) on the bacterial load in hard-to-heal wounds in adults, compared with ultrasonic debridement alone. Secondary outcomes included wound healing, quality of life (QoL) and pain scores.

METHOD:

In this single-blinded, randomised, controlled trial participants were randomised to two groups. All participants received LFCUD weekly for six weeks, plus six weeks of weekly follow-up. The intervention group received an additional 15-minute topical application of PHMB post-LFCUD, at each dressing change and in a sustained dressing product. The control group received non-antimicrobial products and the wounds were cleansed with clean water or saline. Wound swabs were taken from all wounds for microbiological analysis at weeks 1, 3, 6 and 12.

RESULTS:

A total of 50 participants took part. The intervention group (n=25) had a lower bacterial load at week 12 compared with the control group (n=25) (p<0.001). There was no difference in complete wound healing between the groups (p=0.47) or wound-related QoL (p=0.15). However, more wounds deteriorated in the control group (44%) compared with the intervention group (8%, p=0.01). A higher proportion of wounds reduced in size in the intervention group (61% versus 12%, p=0.019). Pain was lower in the intervention group at week six, compared with controls (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION:

LFCUD without the addition of an antimicrobial agent such as PHMB, cannot be recommended. Further research requires longer follow-up time and would benefit from being powered sufficiently to test the effects of multiple covariates.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Úlcera da Perna Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Wound Care Assunto da revista: ENFERMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Úlcera da Perna Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Wound Care Assunto da revista: ENFERMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália