Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Asthma control with ICS-formoterol reliever versus maintenance ICS and SABA reliever therapy: a post hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials.
Hatter, Lee; Houghton, Claire; Bruce, Pepa; Holliday, Mark; Eathorne, Allie; Pavord, Ian; Reddel, Helen K; Hancox, Robert J; Braithwaite, Irene; Oldfield, Karen; Papi, Alberto; Weatherall, Mark; Beasley, Richard.
Afiliação
  • Hatter L; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand lee.hatter@mrinz.ac.nz.
  • Houghton C; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Bruce P; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Holliday M; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Eathorne A; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Pavord I; Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Reddel HK; Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Hancox RJ; Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Braithwaite I; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Oldfield K; General Medicine, Capital and Coast District Health Noard, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Papi A; Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Weatherall M; Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University di Ferrara, Ferarra, Italy.
  • Beasley R; Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 9(1)2022 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36007980
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In randomised controlled trials, as-needed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-formoterol reliever therapy reduces severe exacerbation risk compared with maintenance ICS plus short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) reliever in adolescent and adult asthma, but results in slightly worse control of asthma symptoms, as measured by mean Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) score.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the levels and changes in asthma control for as-needed budesonide-formoterol versus maintenance budesonide plus SABA in post hoc analyses from the Novel START and PRACTICAL clinical trials.

METHODS:

The number and proportion of participants at study end in each ACQ-5 category ('well-controlled', 'partly controlled' or 'inadequately controlled' symptoms), and in each responder category based on the minimal clinically important difference for ACQ-5 of 0.5 (improved, no change and worse) with as-needed budesonide-formoterol and maintenance budesonide plus SABA treatment were calculated.

RESULTS:

With last observation carried forwards, 189/214 (88.3%) and 354/434 (81.6%) of patients in the budesonide-formoterol group had 'well-controlled' or 'partly controlled' symptoms at the end of the study, vs 183/214 (85.5%) and 358/431 (83.1%) in the budesonide maintenance group, for Novel START and PRACTICAL, respectively. The proportion of patients whose symptom control was either improved or unchanged from baseline was 190/214 (88.8%) and 368/434 (84.8%) for budesonide-formoterol, vs 185/214 (86.4%) and 376/431 (87.2%) for maintenance budesonide, in Novel START and PRACTICAL respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

There were no clinically important differences in the proportions of patients with 'well-controlled' or 'partly controlled' asthma symptoms, or proportions who improved or maintained their level of control, with as-needed budesonide-formoterol versus maintenance budesonide plus SABA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Respir Res Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia País de publicação: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Respir Res Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Zelândia País de publicação: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM