Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physical activity and sedentary behaviour following combined aerobic and resistance training in coronary artery disease patients: A randomised controlled trial.
Kambic, Tim; Sarabon, Nejc; Hadzic, Vedran; Lainscak, Mitja.
Afiliação
  • Kambic T; Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit, and Department of Research and Education, General Hospital Murska Sobota, 9000 Murska Sobota, Slovenia; Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Sarabon N; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, 6310 Izola, Slovenia; InnoRenew CoE, Human Health Department, 6310 Izola, Slovenia; S2P, Science to Practice, Ltd., Laboratory for Motor Control and Motor Behavior, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Hadzic V; Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Lainscak M; Division of Cardiology, General Hospital Murska Sobota, 9000 Murska Sobota, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. Electronic address: mitja.lainscak@guest.arnes.si.
Int J Cardiol ; 370: 75-79, 2023 Jan 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36367488
BACKGROUND: Effective training modalities and potential determinants to induce favourable changes in physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) remains elusive in patients with coronary artery disease. AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the effects of high-load resistance training and low-load RT combined with aerobic training in comparison to aerobic training alone on PA and SB, and whether baseline level of SB modifies PA outcomes in coronary artery disease patients. METHODS: We randomised 79 patients to aerobic training, low-load resistance training and aerobic training or high-load resistance training and aerobic training. PA and SB were measured using triaxial accelerometer at baseline and post-training for 8 days. RESULTS: There was no difference between training modalities in post-training PA and SB. When stratified by baseline SB, the very sedentary patients improved SB (-52 min/day, p = 0.001) and light intensity PA (+27 min/day, p = 0.009) following intervention. The improvement in PA was greater in the very sedentary patients (SB: +27%, p = 0.002; light intensity PA: +24%, p = 0.004) and in sedentary patients (SB: +24%, p = 0.009) compared to the very active patients. CONCLUSIONS: Post-training improvement in PA and SB was determined by baseline SB, while the addition of low-load or high-load resistance training provided no further benefits in coronary artery disease patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04638764.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Treinamento Resistido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Eslovênia País de publicação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Treinamento Resistido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Eslovênia País de publicação: Holanda