Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effect of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation After Low-Dose Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review.
Govindaraj, Ramkumar; Khong, Jeremy; Byrne, Adam; Zacest, Andrew; Roos, Daniel.
Afiliação
  • Govindaraj R; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia.
  • Khong J; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Byrne A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia.
  • Zacest A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia.
  • Roos D; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 7(6): 101059, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36420205
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Despite excellent tumor control after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS), the hearing preservation rate remains unsatisfactorily low. Although many factors have been associated with hearing loss, the dose to cochlea has gained more interest in recent years. However, studies investigating the relation between cochlear dose and hearing outcomes have produced inconsistent results. The purpose of this work is to systematically review the literature and critically analyze the studies that investigated the correlation between cochlear dose and hearing loss. Methods and Materials A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was performed. Studies were included if the SRS dose used was 11 to 14 Gy and included adult patients with sporadic VS, initially serviceable hearing, and at least 24 months of mean or median follow-up.

Results:

Twenty-one cohort studies and 1 case-control study were eligible for inclusion, and none were considered to be truly prospective. There was substantial heterogeneity between studies in terms of baseline hearing status, cochlear dosimetry, definition and reporting of hearing outcome, and duration of follow-up, limiting comparison between studies and precluding formal meta-analysis. Eleven studies showed a statistically significant correlation between cochlear dose and hearing outcome, but there was considerable variation in the reported cochlear dose parameter that predicted hearing outcome and whether it was an independent predictor. The definition of hearing outcome and whether the outcome variable is continuous or dichotomous have a bearing on the reported correlation between cochlear dose and hearing outcome.

Conclusions:

Whether cochlear dose is a predictor of hearing preservation after SRS for VS could not be unequivocally determined. Future studies should use consistent cochlear dosimetry and hearing outcomes for reliable assessment. In the meantime, based on currently available data, a practical approach will be to aim for a mean cochlear dose <4 to 6 Gy without compromising tumor dose.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Adv Radiat Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Adv Radiat Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália