Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Expanding Access to Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Among Insulin Users with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes.
Pathak, Shweta; Kearin, Kristina; Kahkoska, Anna R; Fuller, Kathryn A; Staats, Bradley; Albright, Joseph; Stürmer, Til; Buse, John B; Urick, Benjamin Y.
Afiliação
  • Pathak S; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Kearin K; University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Kahkoska AR; Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Fuller KA; University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Staats B; University of North Carolina Kenan-Flagler Business School, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Albright J; BlueCross BlueShield North Carolina, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Stürmer T; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Buse JB; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Urick BY; University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 25(3): 169-177, 2023 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36480256
ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite increased use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, studies to quantify patterns of CGM use are limited. In December 2018, a policy change by a commercial insurer expanded coverage of CGM through the pharmacy benefit, creating an opportunity to evaluate the impact of this change on CGM utilization. Research Design and

Methods:

Pharmacy and medical claims from 2016 to 2020 were used to estimate the prevalence of CGM use among insulin users with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) before and after the policy change. Change in CGM use was assessed using an interrupted time series design.

Results:

At the beginning of the study period, 18.8% of T1DM patients and 1.2% of T2DM patients used CGM. Use rose to 30.5% and 6.6% in the quarter before the policy change. The policy resulted in an immediate 9.5% (P < 0.0001) and 2.8% (P < 0.0001) change in use and increased the rate of quarterly change by 0.5% (P = 0.002) and 0.8% (P < 0.0001). At the end of the study period, 58.2% and 14.9% of T1DM and T2DM patients used CGM.

Conclusion:

CGM use significantly increased after addition to the pharmacy benefit. Rate of change in CGM use was lower in T1DM compared to the T2DM population, but overall use remained higher among patients with T1DM. Increased CGM use in the population studied aligns with those whose clinical guidelines suggest would most likely benefit. Additional work is needed to evaluate the impact of this benefit change on health care spending and outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Technol Ther Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Technol Ther Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos