Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
État des lieux des pratiques de prise en charge des cancers des voies biliaires en France : résultats de l'enquête nationale ACABi.
Delaye, Matthieu; Assenat, Eric; Boleslawski, Emmanuel; Camus, Marine; Edeline, Julien; Henriques, Julie; Herrero, Astrid; Lièvre, Astrid; Malka, David; Turpin, Anthony; Vernerey, Dewi; Neuzillet, Cindy.
Afiliação
  • Delaye M; Institut Curie, département d'oncologie médicale. Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (UVSQ). Saint-Cloud, France; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi). Electronic address: mdelaye@sfr.fr.
  • Assenat E; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi); Département d'oncologie médicale, Institut de cancérologie de Montpellier (ICM), Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Boleslawski E; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi); Département de chirurgie digestive et transplantation, Université de Lille, CHU, 59037 Lille, France.
  • Camus M; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi); Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine (CRSA) & Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre d'Endoscopie Digestive, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Edeline J; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi); Département d'oncologie, Centre Eugène Marquis; Université de Rennes; et INSERM U1242, Rennes, France.
  • Henriques J; Unité de méthodologie et de qualité de vie en oncologie, Hôpital universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • Herrero A; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi); Département de chirurgie digestive, mini-invasive et oncologique, centre hospitalo-universitaire de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier.
  • Lièvre A; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi); Département de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Universitaire Pontchaillou, Université de Rennes, INSERM U1242, Rennes, France.
  • Malka D; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi); Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • Turpin A; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi); Université de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277, CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, 59000, Lille, France.
  • Vernerey D; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi); Unité de méthodologie et de qualité de vie en oncologie, Hôpital universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • Neuzillet C; Institut Curie, département d'oncologie médicale. Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin (UVSQ). Saint-Cloud, France; Association pour l'étude des Cancers et Affections des voies Biliaires (ACABi).
Bull Cancer ; 109(11S): 11S3-11S10, 2022 Nov.
Article em Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36535761
Overview of biliary tract cancer management practices in France: results of the ACABi national survey INTRODUCTION: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare. Their management has evolved in recent years. ACABi conducted a survey on the management practices of CVB in France. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary team and distributed (June-July 2021) by the French digestive oncology societies. The data were analyzed according to the type of practice center (group A: university hospital or cancer comprehensive center, group B: general hospital or private hospital) RESULTS: 172 physicians (hepato-gastroenterologists: 58.0%, oncologists: 19.5% and surgeons: 18.3%), representing all French regions, responded. Access to echo-endoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography was identical between the groups (> 80%), unlike cholangioscopy (group A: 82.9%, group B: 63.6%). In the adjuvant setting, capecitabine was proposed in the majority (> 65%). For non-operable tumors, the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy was cisplatin/gemcitabine (CISGEM, 66.3%). In 38.5% of cases, it was not performed in the day hospital and only 13.6% proposed a break after a fixed number of courses. The most commonly used second-line treatment was 5FU/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX, 52.3%). Molecular profiling was performed in more than half of the patients for 41.1% of respondents in group A and 18.8% in group B. DISCUSSION: This survey shows the application of therapeutic standards but also certain practices diverging from the recommendations as well as disparities between centers.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar / Gencitabina Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: Fr Revista: Bull Cancer Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar / Gencitabina Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: Fr Revista: Bull Cancer Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: França