Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The theoretical foundations of enaction: Precariousness.
Beer, Randall D; Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.
Afiliação
  • Beer RD; Cognitive Science Program, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, Indiana University, USA. Electronic address: rdbeer@indiana.edu.
  • Di Paolo EA; Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bizkaia, Spain; IAS-Research Center for Life, Mind and Society, University of the Basque Country, Donostia, Spain; Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Biosystems ; 223: 104823, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36574923
Enaction is an increasingly influential approach to cognition that grew out of Maturana and Varela's earlier work on autopoiesis and the biology of cognition. As with any relatively new scientific discipline, the enactive approach would benefit greatly from a careful analysis of its theoretical foundations. Here we initiate such an analysis for one of the core concepts of enaction, precariousness. Specifically, we consider three types of fragility: systemic, processual and thermodynamic. Using a glider in the Game of Life as a toy model, we illustrate each of these fragilities and examine the relationships between them. We also argue that each type of fragility is characterized by which aspects of a system are hardwired into its definition from the outset and which aspects are emergent and hence vulnerable to disintegration without ongoing maintenance.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vida Idioma: En Revista: Biosystems Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vida Idioma: En Revista: Biosystems Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Irlanda