Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility and safety of neck level IB-sparing radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer: a long-term single institution analysis.
Kim, Dowook; Keam, Bhumsuk; Ahn, Soon-Hyun; Choi, Chang Heon; Wu, Hong-Gyun.
Afiliação
  • Kim D; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Keam B; Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Ahn SH; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Choi CH; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Wu HG; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Radiat Oncol J ; 40(4): 260-269, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36606303
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) has a higher prevalence of regional nodal metastasis than other head and neck cancers; however, level IB lymph node involvement is rare. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of level IB-sparing radiotherapy (RT) for NPC patients. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed 236 patients with NPC who underwent definitive intensity-modulated RT with or without chemotherapy between 2004 and 2018. Of them, 212 received IB-sparing RT, and 24 received non-IB-sparing RT. We conducted a propensity score matching analysis to compare treatment outcomes according to IB-sparing status. In addition, dosimetric analysis of the salivary glands was performed to identify the relationship between xerostomia and the IB-sparing RT.

RESULTS:

The median follow-up duration was 78 months (range, 7 to 194 months). Local, regional, and distant recurrences were observed in 11.9%, 6.8%, and 16.1% of patients, respectively. Of the 16 patients with regional recurrence, 14 underwent IB-sparing RT. The most common site categorization of regional recurrence was level II (75%), followed by retropharyngeal lymph nodes (43.8%); however, there was no recurrence at level IB. In the matched cohorts, IB-sparing RT was not significantly related to treatment outcomes. However, IB-sparing RT patients received a significantly lower mean ipsilateral and contralateral submandibular glands doses (all, p < 0.001) and had a lower incidence of chronic xerostomia compared with non-IB-sparing RT patients (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION:

Our results demonstrated that IB-sparing RT is sufficiently safe and feasible for treating NPC. To reduce the occurrence of xerostomia, IB-sparing RT should be considered without compromising target coverage.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Radiat Oncol J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Radiat Oncol J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article