Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) reporting methodology in glioma MRI studies using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM).
Bhandari, Abhishta; Scott, Luke; Weilbach, Manuela; Marwah, Ravi; Lasocki, Arian.
Afiliação
  • Bhandari A; Townsville University Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive, Townsville, QLD, 4814, Australia. Abhishta.bhandari@my.jcu.edu.au.
  • Scott L; School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, QLD, 4814, Australia. Abhishta.bhandari@my.jcu.edu.au.
  • Weilbach M; Cairns Hospital, 165 Esplanade, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia.
  • Marwah R; Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, QLD, 4020, Australia.
  • Lasocki A; Townsville University Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive, Townsville, QLD, 4814, Australia.
Neuroradiology ; 65(5): 907-913, 2023 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36746792
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) is a recently released guideline designed for the optimal reporting methodology of artificial intelligence (AI) studies. Gliomas are the most common form of primary malignant brain tumour and numerous outcomes derived from AI algorithms such as grading, survival, treatment-related effects and molecular status have been reported. The aim of the study is to evaluate the AI reporting methodology for outcomes relating to gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the CLAIM criteria.

METHODS:

A literature search was performed on three databases pertaining to AI augmentation of glioma MRI, published between the start of 2018 and the end of 2021

RESULTS:

A total of 4308 articles were identified and 138 articles remained after screening. These articles were categorised into four main AI tasks grading (n= 44), predicting molecular status (n= 50), predicting survival (n= 25) and distinguishing true tumour progression from treatment-related effects (n= 10). The average CLAIM score was 20/42 (range 10-31). Studies most consistently reported the scientific background and clinical role of their AI approach. Areas of improvement were identified in the reporting of data collection, data management, ground truth and validation of AI performance.

CONCLUSION:

AI may be a means of producing high-accuracy results for certain tasks in glioma MRI; however, there remain issues with reporting quality. AI reporting guidelines may aid in a more reproducible and standardised approach to reporting and will aid in clinical integration.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Glioma Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroradiology Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Glioma Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroradiology Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália