Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Engagement in Free Open Access Medical Education by US Nephrology Fellows.
Larsen, Dana M; Boscardin, Christy K; Sparks, Matthew A.
Afiliação
  • Larsen DM; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Boscardin CK; Division of Nephrology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
  • Sparks MA; Departments of Medicine and Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36800537
BACKGROUND: As free open access medical education (FOAMed) use increases, it is important to characterize how and why learners are using this educational material in nephrology. We describe the frequency, purpose, and type of FOAMed usage across US nephrology fellows. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, items were emailed to all US adult and pediatric nephrology fellows via the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Fellow Survey in May 2022. The eight-item survey, developed to measure FOAMed engagement, had previously undergone instrument validation. The results were analyzed by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In total, 43% (359/842) adult nephrology fellows and 51% (45/88) pediatric nephrology fellows completed the survey. Seventy-four percent (300/404) of fellows reported using FOAMed, and 72% (215/300) started using FOAMed within the past 2 years. Of FOAMed users, 41% (122/300) reported viewing FOAMed and 33% (99/300) reported applying knowledge gained from these resources daily or weekly. Common purposes for FOAMed engagement included searching Twitter to learn about others' opinions in the field (43%; 130/300), reading blogs to answer clinical questions (35%; 105/300), and listening to podcasts for the most up-to-date information (39%; 116/300). Compared with traditional educational resources, fellows preferred using FOAMed for staying up to date on nephrology topics (75%) and answering clinical questions (37%). Among all fellows, the greatest barriers to FOAMed use were unfamiliarity with FOAMed (27%; 111/404), validity concerns (22%; 90/404), and a lack of a local community of FOAMed users (22%; 87/404). CONCLUSIONS: Seventy-four percent of nephrology fellows used FOAMed resources in a variety of ways, and of them, 33% of fellows clinically applied knowledge gained from these resources. Reasons for engaging with FOAMed varied across resources.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos