Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transitioning from epicutaneous to oral peanut immunotherapy.
Wong, Lauren; Kost, Laurie; Anderson, Brent; Long, Andrew; Sindher, Sayantani B; Chinthrajah, R Sharon; Collins, William J.
Afiliação
  • Wong L; Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
  • Kost L; Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
  • Anderson B; Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
  • Long A; Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
  • Sindher SB; Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
  • Chinthrajah RS; Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
  • Collins WJ; Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Front Allergy ; 4: 1089308, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36814725
Introduction: Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) has been tested in clinical trials for children with peanut allergy (PA) for its safety and efficacy in inducing desensitization. Aside from peanut avoidance and symptom management, oral immunotherapy (OIT) is another option for PA patients. However, OIT can be associated with adverse events and pose safety concerns to children and their caregivers. Methods: This study assessed 27 children who successfully completed a peanut EPIT trial. 18 of them transitioned to peanut OIT with starting doses ranging from 10-600 mg of peanut protein. Our aim was to learn more about the EPIT to OIT experience through descriptive survey responses and to gather information that may support the sequential use of the two immunotherapies for safe and positive outcomes that may not be achieved by either alone. Results: Overall, children and their caregivers had less anxiety about starting OIT after having had peanut exposure through EPIT. Most children who transitioned from EPIT to OIT had no or minor symptoms initially, with symptoms lessening later in OIT. Most were also able to maintain or increase their peanut dose over time, achieving maintenance doses of 60-2,000 mg. Discussion: In comparison with current literature on OIT for PA in children, the reported symptoms appeared less severe and less prevalent in the EPIT to OIT group. However, there were 3 participants who withdrew from OIT due to the development of intolerable symptoms. This study provides initial data in support of EPIT to OIT, and larger randomized controlled trials assessing effectiveness of the two therapies together are warranted.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Front Allergy Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Front Allergy Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Suíça