Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review.
Hoang, Tuyet N; Musquiz, Brittney N; Tubog, Tito D.
Afiliação
  • Hoang TN; Graduate Programs of Nurse Anesthesia, Texas Wesleyan University, Fort Worth, TX.
  • Musquiz BN; Graduate Programs of Nurse Anesthesia, Texas Wesleyan University, Fort Worth, TX.
  • Tubog TD; Graduate Programs of Nurse Anesthesia, Texas Wesleyan University, Fort Worth, TX. Electronic address: tdtubog@txwes.edu.
J Perianesth Nurs ; 38(4): 650-656.e8, 2023 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36858859
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the effects of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) or conventional fluid therapy (CFT) in improving postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries.

DESIGN:

Evidence-Based Review.

METHODS:

Following the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA statement, a comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Oxford Academic, EBSCO, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and gray literature. Only randomized controlled studies and preappraised evidence such as systematic review with meta-analysis examining the effects of GDFT and CFT in colorectal surgery were included. The quality appraisal of the literature was conducted using the proposed algorithm described in the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Evidence Level and Quality Guide.

FINDINGS:

Two systematic reviews with meta-analyses and four randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving 2018 patients were included in this review. Overall, the use of GDFT did not shorten the hospital length of stay (LOS), reduce 30-day mortality, lower overall morbidity rates, or decrease incidence of postoperative ileus. Additionally, the return of bowel function was not improved using GDFT or CFT. However, when GDFT was implemented within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs, there was a significant reduction in hospital LOS. . When GDFT was used in a non-ERAS patient care setting, there was a significant reduction in overall morbidity rate and faster time to first flatus. All studies included in the review were categorized as Level I and rated Grade A, implying strong confidence in the true effects of GDFT on all outcome measures in the review.

CONCLUSIONS:

The benefits of GDFT in colorectal surgery are still unclear. Considerable heterogeneity based on the types of GDFT devices, patient outcome parameters, and fluid protocols limit the application to clinical practice. Furthermore, there was limited data on the effects of GDFT in high-risk patients for colorectal surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Cirurgia Colorretal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Perianesth Nurs Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / ENFERMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório / Cirurgia Colorretal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Perianesth Nurs Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / ENFERMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article