Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Follow-up strategies for lung transplant recipients in France]. / Suivi partagé des patients transplantés pulmonaires.
Dégot, T; Douvry, B; Falque, L; Bautin, N; Frachon, I; Mankikian, J; Le Pavec, J; Picard, C.
Afiliação
  • Dégot T; Groupe de transplantation pulmonaire, service de pneumologie, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, nouvel hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: tristan.degot@chru-strasbourg.fr.
  • Douvry B; Service de pneumologie, centre hospitalier intercommunal, centre des maladies respiratoires rares (RESPIRARE®), CRCM, Créteil, France; Inserm, IMRB, université Paris-Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France.
  • Falque L; Pôle thorax et vaisseaux, service hospitalier universitaire pneumologie physiologie, CHU de Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
  • Bautin N; Inserm, CHU de Lille, université de Lille, CNRS, institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019 - UMR 9017 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France.
  • Frachon I; Service de pneumologie, CHU, hôpital Cavale Blanche, Brest, France.
  • Mankikian J; Service de pneumologie et d'explorations fonctionnelles respiratoires, CHU, hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France.
  • Le Pavec J; Service de pneumologie et transplantation pulmonaire, groupe hospitalier Marie-Lannelongue - Saint-Joseph, Le Plessis-Robinson, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Inserm, UMR_S 999, université Paris-Sud, groupe hospitalier Marie-Lannelongue - Saint-Joseph, Le Plessis-Robins
  • Picard C; Groupe de transplantation pulmonaire, service de pneumologie, hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Rev Mal Respir ; 40(4): 314-323, 2023 Apr.
Article em Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36868975
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lung transplantation (LT) requires sustained care for a frequently polypathological condition. Follow-up is focused on three main issues 1/stability of respiratory function; 2/comorbidity management; 3/preventive medicine. About 3000 LT patients in France are treated in 11 LT centers. Given the increased size of the LT recipient cohort, follow-up might be partially shared with peripheral centers.

METHODS:

This paper presents the suggestions of a working group of the SPLF (French-speaking respiratory medicine society) on possible modalities of shared follow-up.

RESULTS:

While the main LT center is tasked with centralizing follow-up, particularly the choice of optimal immunosuppression, an identified peripheral center (PC) may serve as an alternative to deal with acute events, comorbidities and routine assessment. Communication between the different centers should be free-flowing. Shared follow-up may be offered from the 3rd postoperative year to stable and consenting patients, whereas unstable and non-observant patients are poor candidates.

CONCLUSION:

These guidelines may serve as a reference for any pneumologist wishing to effectively contribute to follow-up, even and especially subsequent to lung transplant.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Pulmão / Transplantados Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Fr Revista: Rev Mal Respir Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Pulmão / Transplantados Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Fr Revista: Rev Mal Respir Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article