Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiotherapy Alone Versus Concurrent or Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients with Negative Epstein-Barr Virus DNA after Induction Chemotherapy.
Kong, Fangfang; Pan, Guangsen; Du, Chengrun; Hu, Chaosu; Ying, Hongmei.
Afiliação
  • Kong F; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
  • Pan G; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
  • Du C; Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China.
  • Hu C; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai 200032, China.
  • Ying H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(6)2023 Mar 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36980576
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy (IC) plus radiotherapy (RT) and IC plus concurrent or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT/AC) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with negative Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) after IC. A total of 547 NPC patients with negative plasma EBV DNA post-IC were included. Patients were classified into the IC + RT group and the IC + CCRT/AC group. Locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the variables. The median follow-up time was 37 months. The 3-year LRFS, DMFS, OS, and PFS rates for the whole group were 92.2%, 92.4%, 96.4%, and 84.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in LRFS, DMFS, OS, and PFS between the IC + RT and the IC + CCRT/AC groups, both before PSM (3-year rates of 91.1% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.94; 95.6% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.08; 95.2% vs. 96.8%, p = 0.80; 85.9% vs. 84.0%, p = 0.38) and after PSM (90.7% vs. 92.7%, p = 0.77; 96.8% vs. 93.7%, p = 0.29; 94.5% vs. 93.9%, p = 0.57; 84.7% vs. 85.6%, p = 0.96). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the treatment schedule was not an independent predictor for survival rates. Patients in the IC + RT group had fewer treatment-related acute toxicities and better tolerance. IC + RT displayed similar survival outcomes as IC + CCRT/AC for NPC patients with negative post-IC EBV DNA.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Suíça