Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accounting for the High Enrollment of African Americans on Winship Cancer Institute's Myeloma Clinical Trials.
McClary, T S; Blee, S M; Avinger, A M; Dai, Q; Switchenko, J; Dixon, M D; Pentz, R D.
Afiliação
  • McClary TS; Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, 1365, Clifton Road, 30322 Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Blee SM; South University Orlando Campus5900 Lake Ellenor Dr, Orlando Fl 32809.
  • Avinger AM; Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, 1365, Clifton Road, 30322 Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Dai Q; Creighton University Medical School2621 Burt Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68178.
  • Switchenko J; Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, 1365, Clifton Road, 30322 Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Dixon MD; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 475 Vine St, Winston-Salem, NC 27101.
  • Pentz RD; School of Public Health, Emory University Rollins, 1518, Clifton Road, 30322 Atlanta, GA, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37007841
ABSTRACT

Background:

Thirty-four percent of Multiple Myeloma (MM) clinical trial participants at Winship Cancer Institute (Winship) are African American (AA); however, AAs make up only 4.5 percent of myeloma clinical trial participants in the United States. Given our high enrollment, we aimed to measure AAs' trust in providers and identify if clinical trial enrollment barriers exist.

Methodology:

A member of the ethics research team surveyed AA patients who had consented to a MM clinical trial at Winship. Three validated surveys were used Trust in Medical Research (TMR); Human Connection (THC) which measures how much patients feel they are heard and valued by their physicians; and the Duke Intrinsic Religiosity Scale (DUREL) which measures strength of religious engagement and belief. The survey also included questions about the impact of side effects, distance to the trial center and trial related costs on the decision to participate in clinical trial.

Results:

Ninety-two percent (61/67) of patients approached consented. The mean TMR score and the mean THC score were significantly higher (P-value < 0.001) than the results obtained in key national surveys (TMR 14.9 compared to 11.65; THC 57.7 compared to 54.6). These two surveys were significantly correlated, meaning trust and human connection increase or decrease in tandem. The 3 religiosity subscale results showed high religiosity (3.84, 4.36, and 4.35 with 5 being the highest score). The mean scores of the importance of the investigational agent's side effects, trial costs, and distance to trial center on the decision to enroll in a clinical trial were also high (8.5, 7.8, and 6.5, respectively, with 10 being the most important).

Conclusion:

In our study population, high trust and human connection overcame other trial participation barriers strong religious beliefs and concerns about side effects, costs, and travel distance. We present a roadmap to guide investigators to increase human connection, and hopefully trust.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics Idioma: En Revista: Ethics Med Public Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics Idioma: En Revista: Ethics Med Public Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos