Endoscopic treatment in pediatric patients with recurrent and H-type tracheoesophageal fistulas - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic treatments for managing recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula (rTEF) and H-type TEF are being utilized lately; however, the preferred technique is yet to be determined. We aimed to systematically review existing publications on endoscopic treatment of rTEF and H-type TEF to analyze their success and complication rates. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched in accordance to a priori developed protocol, from 1975 until 2020. English, Spanish and German papers were included. Studies were independently screened and analyzed by two reviewers. RESULTS: 84 full texts were assessed for eligibility out of 581 screened studies, of these, 39 studies with 127 patients were eligible for inclusion (115 rTEF and 12 H-type TEF). All included studies were cases reports or case series. Overall success rate was 45% with sealant injection, 87% with de-epithelialization and 80% with sealant injection and de-epithelialization combined. The mean number of required treatments for success was 1.9 (range 1-6). Mixed effect model meta-analysis of case series with n > 1 showed that sealant injection had a significantly lower success rate of 50% (95% CI 1-99%, I2 72%) compared to de-epithelialization 90% (95% CI 72-99%, I2 27%), p = 0.007 and the combination of both techniques 87% (95% CI 68-99%, I2 11%), p = 0.02. Nine patients (7%) had transient respiratory distress. No mortalities reported. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment for rTEF and H-type fistula is a minimally invasive technique with favorable outcome and considerably less morbidity compared to open surgery, suggesting it as a safe and effective first line treatment option. Repeated endoscopic treatment attempts can be expected to obtain complete closure. De-epithelization techniques with or without combined tissue adhesive injection had significantly better results than sealant injection techniques alone.